From: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg: MemoryInitPei: fix wrong check for system memory
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:44:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN9vWD+XmoSvmRq5aHt-cf7qsyRBparT3UX_ADE5WiidwrgNEw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN9vWDJBezuMeuF_7yzqLwWBeSWSkXs=RuVaQt2cx3_BSkLrLw@mail.gmail.com>
mh after thinking about it, wouldn't it be better to swap the '<='
operands instead of changing the operator? this way the PCD memory
would be on the left side for both comparisons which seems more clear.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Michael Zimmermann
<sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com> wrote:
> The code in question is supposed to check if the memory range defined
> in the PCD is fully included in the memory resource descriptor of the
> current iteration. The condition for that is wrong. example:
> PcdSystemMemoryBase = 0x80000000
> PcdSystemMemorySize = 0x10000000
> ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart = 0x40000000
> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength = 0x10000000
>
> obviously, the resource descriptor doesn't contain the system memory.
> but the old logic would have selected this Hob because:
> 0x80000000>=0x40000000 && 0x50000000 <= 0x90000000
> The second comparison probably was supposed to have the
> ResourceDescriptor values on the right side,
> I fixed it by just inverting the direction of the comparison which then becomes:
> 0x80000000>=0x40000000 && 0x50000000 >= 0x90000000
>
> And this comparison now successfully fails but will still be
> successful for the case we're checking for.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
> ---
> ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> b/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> index 2feb11f..8f67812 100644
> --- a/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ MemoryPeim (
> while ((NextHob.Raw = GetNextHob (EFI_HOB_TYPE_RESOURCE_DESCRIPTOR,
> NextHob.Raw)) != NULL) {
> if ((NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceType ==
> EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) &&
> (PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemoryBase) >=
> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart) &&
> - (NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart +
> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength <= PcdGet64
> (PcdSystemMemoryBase) + PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemorySize)))
> + (NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart +
> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength >= PcdGet64
> (PcdSystemMemoryBase) + PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemorySize)))
> {
> Found = TRUE;
> break;
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Could you provide a message body explaining the error that this patch
>> fixes so that I don't sprain my brain trying to figure it out?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 04:46:57PM +0100, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
>>> b/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
>>> index 2feb11f21d..8f6781212e 100644
>>> --- a/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
>>> +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPei/MemoryInitPeiLib.c
>>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ MemoryPeim (
>>> while ((NextHob.Raw = GetNextHob (EFI_HOB_TYPE_RESOURCE_DESCRIPTOR,
>>> NextHob.Raw)) != NULL) {
>>> if ((NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceType ==
>>> EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) &&
>>> (PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemoryBase) >=
>>> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart) &&
>>> - (NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart +
>>> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength <= PcdGet64
>>> (PcdSystemMemoryBase) + PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemorySize)))
>>
>> It looks like the patch got corrupted on submission (lines wrapped).
>> Could you resend it please?
>>
>>> + (NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->PhysicalStart +
>>> NextHob.ResourceDescriptor->ResourceLength >= PcdGet64
>>> (PcdSystemMemoryBase) + PcdGet64 (PcdSystemMemorySize)))
>>> {
>>> Found = TRUE;
>>> break;
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 15:46 [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg: MemoryInitPei: fix wrong check for system memory Michael Zimmermann
2017-01-13 4:47 ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-01-16 18:09 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-01-16 18:43 ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-01-16 18:44 ` Michael Zimmermann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN9vWD+XmoSvmRq5aHt-cf7qsyRBparT3UX_ADE5WiidwrgNEw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox