From: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
To: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg/ArmDisassemblerLib: fix check for MSR instruction
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:08:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN9vWDKLRckxuaKo_3Zj3DGEjqeTiMfOs3rSK5FZ+v+feLzttg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607050704.9531-1-sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
CC the arm maintainers
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:07 AM Michael Zimmermann
<sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: M1cha <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
>
> GCC8 reported it with the following warning:
> ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c: In function 'DisassembleArmInstruction':
> ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c:397:30: error: bitwise
> comparison always evaluates to false [-Werror=tautological-compare]
> if ((OpCode & 0x0db00000) == 0x03200000) {
>
> This condition trys to be true for both the immediate and the register
> version of the MSR instruction. They get identified inside the if-block
> using the variable I, which contains the value of bit 25.
>
> The problem with the comparison reported by GCC is that the
> bitmask excludes bit 25, while the value requires it to be set to one:
> 0x0db00000: 0000 11011 0 11 00 00 0000 000000000000
> 0x03200000: 0000 00110 0 10 00 00 0000 000000000000
> ^
> So the solution is to just don't require that bit to be set, because
> it gets checked later using 'I', which results in the following value:
> 0x01200000: 0000 00010 0 10 00 00 0000 000000000000
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
> ---
> ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c
> index 29d9414a78b3..b449a5d3cd83 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmDisassemblerLib/ArmDisassembler.c
> @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ DisassembleArmInstruction (
> }
>
>
> - if ((OpCode & 0x0db00000) == 0x03200000) {
> + if ((OpCode & 0x0db00000) == 0x01200000) {
> // A4.1.38 MSR{<cond>} CPSR_<fields>, #<immediate> MSR{<cond>} CPSR_<fields>, <Rm>
> if (I) {
> // MSR{<cond>} CPSR_<fields>, #<immediate>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 5:07 [PATCH] ArmPkg/ArmDisassemblerLib: fix check for MSR instruction Michael Zimmermann
2018-06-07 5:08 ` Michael Zimmermann [this message]
2018-06-07 7:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-07 17:03 ` Michael Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAN9vWDKLRckxuaKo_3Zj3DGEjqeTiMfOs3rSK5FZ+v+feLzttg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox