From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A58381D99 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c13so124027970lfg.0 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:04:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=m032EtdsSlgJ17UfUP+vICnYoWrxVprs1o7D7048OuQ=; b=YQip4QnEm0fRzDHcFvwCRfwTUGuR+2HM3JScnDD2OnT9GDcL08UjLb1ekFePvS9lwV JXTQdAkEGgcJScaQdS8+y3x3O8I/s1FksvRce+GRmOejQuzhz0Nwbnd5EquXxOx3Hlre hJeJ7wlKiZjPRUkWpdPHf1DNquae1jebsddS3U69G/4uFCD7Ld1ob4Z2BHPftmzd0h/U 9LPgFqmwHk6MGPfQfEcjdYDOQ9IrKDkAPAP3eWg5+Vi7DK0mjq7ccSfOPMGAjYRkvpeG 2ljL7yCHo6hD4IqIkiIih7tVyUjxkbdXbtnqMBNzpx3KVryN3qPzEjUqSUEUezZOBxC1 /eHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=m032EtdsSlgJ17UfUP+vICnYoWrxVprs1o7D7048OuQ=; b=k5K+ScPzD8//+WW8O5Tj7POhVznKF8jAT86LfgKqaT70ckk0M1y1c/yQAL7Cvc8n0w wvlWHIlu77eXAPpRvnCeaEOgpzFNmNXV/itcNt+YcHDtdcYFoXFq216KtHnkE3AVU3Ns OOoyQkJSDlpk85G/O5DAjv6XR0ELX1RTCsvecY+JENlrp1Yd0hOqspCJEkIyBT1xM0+Z SSDXDSzBLy0FPRsioMfsyDdgWUKLx2/HAszYBF1tnnzaimGkWQ1x6mBY0iUa7ZeZN1VR tFlzWwk1ncUFCpT5qgrs7wcVU8tpi3XrvaMVubz1Pill8Omiv8xCWOQUumVh0+iu0nL5 Jzmg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfj5iCAMilBh4qLQe1J8JxdKM97RVdkfXXTj47Jk6VYso9CWUTRm9lsZwp52VUHHq2DTjz/DW2rWAVOPA== X-Received: by 10.25.202.9 with SMTP id a9mr4413329lfg.161.1478552673390; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:04:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.29.194 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <660f572b-9945-34ef-54ae-5e434f19f473@redhat.com> References: <660f572b-9945-34ef-54ae-5e434f19f473@redhat.com> From: valerij zaporogeci Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:04:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: edk2-devel Subject: Re: NotifyPpi description contradiction X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:04:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thank you very much, Laszlo, for the detailed answer. With your explanation, I understood what this quote on page 26 really means: Quote: This service will fire notifications on PPIs installed prior to this service invocation. If it would say "immediately" in the end of the sentence, as you did, it would be much clearer. I thought, that for preexistent PPI instances, NotifyPpi() won't call the callback at all.