From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.128.65; helo=mail-wm1-f65.google.com; envelope-from=pmathieu@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6B5211648BB for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id p2-v6so7746129wmc.2 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:28:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+FXESVAIoavJCewv+tiKCw+RSJQrOcbzucyR4KiLuiE=; b=RyDssZTfGrn4VdBmowoBg4kv0c5SAHJ6uRSj91tyMtI5so1m5dLyx4TSfAIpvF9WZw 79us+ypRb8yzjiJzDjVZIC7SMnq7PcRcOr6BlUJi/DaTULhy9atc9l0trGuTr3h7CuOo aKSOg3O/lJ5XL+KIcWKGQNR0kJDcmSahuzI6rnK67LSQVi5ILJm+03sw6wPbTPh8gIXy d/PCLFpO2zfTBnCuAtXc7iaKvsrOQ5F5ymssk7CjtCfRou4mPombPNNh/P4EqXVuX1xh EeGE5PiIffSrkUmhjB9nXYkeQ4NF13lIjJJO3Wc2dJcd3GAQ7gPsLen0FxBjjMxa8/bh OIqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL0jH3A6M2RbULV2IoF4V4e5gi/2fiO/JJpSIc9EKQr+yCs6YQc B1I4Xa0z1SW9vvMLLQEtD1mfWWwupNuRNL8oGN2Qxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5drNCa4zE6y4gO3IIQXfOgN/TTGDkyAZrSv+0IB6rmBIiEIKen6sxFmEqe/nyTlFRn9Asx7euOko/JKgKimRM8= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5885:: with SMTP id m127-v6mr7215083wmb.118.1542022123773; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:28:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181102032402.19686-1-yuchenlin@synology.com> <20181102032402.19686-6-yuchenlin@synology.com> <4d3da28e-42ca-c54e-1efa-c6fc8c9b0fb2@redhat.com> <3167b5fd-5514-5a79-e400-39d7c64e50ea@redhat.com> <6d5e3697-6da6-37bb-c47d-a971c6c360d0@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:28:32 +0100 Message-ID: To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: yuchenlin , Anthony Perard , Jordan Justen , edk2-devel-01 , Phil Dennis-Jordan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] OvmfPkg: simply use the Bochs interface for vmsvga X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:28:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:20 PM Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 11/06/18 14:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > > On 6/11/18 14:36, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> On 11/06/18 12:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> > >>> ... While we discuss this, I'll go ahead and push the first four > >>> patches. The code being reverted is dead anyway. I'll report back abo= ut > >>> the commit hashes. > >> > >> Before pushing the first four patches, I regression-tested them as wel= l. > >> Using: Cirrus, stdvga, and QXL. My QEMU version was > >> v3.0.0-1763-gb2f7a038bb4c. The machine type was "pc-q35-3.0". > >> > >> For the first four patches: > >> - Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek , > >> - pushed them as commit range 62ea70e31285..328409ce8de7. > > > > Thanks Laszlo! > > A bit late, but 1-4 reviewed too. > > can you please formally state your R-b, for the first four patches? For > when I apply them again, after edk2-stable201811. Sure, I was not aware the "reply to cover" option was not formal for this list, I'll do. (TIL: "reply to cover" is list CoC specific)