From: Sergei Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic parameters
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 03:26:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPEA6dbcukh6yeoskgE5OXba2vCCO7h2f2a=uwwSM5kV+b3xWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D730154@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
> Sergey:
> Now, VS and GCC don't report such issue. How do you find them?
Clang build for ARM64 revealed it.
> And, this change modifies the function API, does it impact the consumer code?
No changes to the consumer code are needed - integer promotions are
handled by the compilers. In fact, even the ABI remains the same b/c
full words are passed as function parameters.
Regards,
Sergey
>
> Thanks
> Liming
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergei Temerkhanov [mailto:s.temerkhanov@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 8:11 PM
>> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic parameters
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>> > Sergey:
>> > Could you give more detail on the undefined behavior on variadic parameters?
>> >
>> > I see https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410 describe this issues found in the latest CLANG tool chain. Do you find
>> other tool chain reports it?
>>
>> Yes, this is exactly the bug this patch fixes.
>>
>> As per the C99 standard:
>> "The parameter parmN is the identifier of the rightmost parameter in
>> the variable parameter list in the function definition (the one just
>> before the , ...). If the parameter parmN is declared with the
>> register storage class, with a function or array type, or with a type
>> that is not compatible with the type that results after application of
>> the default argument promotions, the behavior is undefined."
>>
>> That's exactly the case here since BOOLEAN is a typedef for unsigned
>> char. It undergoes a promotion to an unsigned int which is not a
>> compatible type for unsigned char. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sergey
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Liming
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Sergey Temerkhanov
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 10:57 AM
>> >> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> >> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic parameters
>> >>
>> >> Fix undefined behavior by avoiding parameter type promotion
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h | 2 +-
>> >> MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c | 2 +-
>> >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>> >> index 0b14792..4e4697c 100644
>> >> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>> >> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>> >> @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ CHAR8 *
>> >> EFIAPI
>> >> GetBestLanguage (
>> >> IN CONST CHAR8 *SupportedLanguages,
>> >> - IN BOOLEAN Iso639Language,
>> >> + IN UINTN Iso639Language,
>> >> ...
>> >> );
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c b/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>> >> index a7eee01..74528ec 100644
>> >> --- a/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>> >> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>> >> @@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ CHAR8 *
>> >> EFIAPI
>> >> GetBestLanguage (
>> >> IN CONST CHAR8 *SupportedLanguages,
>> >> - IN BOOLEAN Iso639Language,
>> >> + IN UINTN Iso639Language,
>> >> ...
>> >> )
>> >> {
>> >> --
>> >> 2.7.4
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> edk2-devel mailing list
>> >> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 2:56 [PATCH] Arm: GICv3: Don't access GIC_ICDIPR for interrupts 0..31 Sergey Temerkhanov
2017-05-16 2:56 ` [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic parameters Sergey Temerkhanov
2017-05-16 5:10 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-16 12:10 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-17 15:30 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-18 0:26 ` Sergei Temerkhanov [this message]
2017-05-18 3:06 ` Andrew Fish
2017-05-19 3:01 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-18 10:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-05-19 1:35 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-19 8:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-05-19 2:45 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-19 8:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-05-24 2:14 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-24 2:46 ` Kinney, Michael D
2017-05-24 11:15 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-16 2:56 ` [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: " Sergey Temerkhanov
2017-05-18 16:08 ` [PATCH] Arm: GICv3: Don't access GIC_ICDIPR for interrupts 0..31 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-19 2:37 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-19 10:26 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-05-19 14:31 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-22 17:45 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-05-23 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPEA6dbcukh6yeoskgE5OXba2vCCO7h2f2a=uwwSM5kV+b3xWA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox