From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vbSSfgOe;
 spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.167.178, mailfrom: jabirm@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com (mail-oi1-f178.google.com [209.85.167.178])
 by groups.io with SMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:34:15 -0700
Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id k10so5700661oik.7
        for <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=dbxYa/QqQcqxYXtdlogXAFsC4yVQDhq0vvjoPDlc4t8=;
        b=vbSSfgOeAqZEpSGDcVG1xzDZ3fNowrF81ogZqLr6Yp0+xhBSv9YBuYT/VSEIeZPz31
         X6LhTcBnonlA2m2wmiwOB+aI+QscThupDaRPK3UYrvzp8LL7B6pnmCtZQbcBN3tLPE02
         wiUcFImko0+AHxqSSQlBNt2xTLzUOouh0sJfy6iW+tl83NAE/dpDCYb5uMppeZQiLGUi
         MeZitENny+0TnQHwgUov/KnUmjzW1JQ0pli9v5rTjWLAbyQVhhwCEXUeM+/pyhhVRPzR
         5a34nbKrC4xjTx6kUI/mrN9S/sptwQv1gZb0uIb2L3pZ12EoQdqEPUS9JIW1Fafh3u9Q
         gdCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=dbxYa/QqQcqxYXtdlogXAFsC4yVQDhq0vvjoPDlc4t8=;
        b=aLskeW+hUmAC82XmrAX7uZ3wIIFh6h++FaL9YiAB9cXcNujxGuQrW4h6ZAhUlBRgUe
         SfhYL/KxxIbAmtA7zaWQeamqINAjabNdqy00YCTDXFZWQN8q0hMWSRglnzawOWW7hWFE
         c/mcPFIvIbZwoaQWdvS9WMwYMlrtXJwLGPIQKxZ+7kaN+FRSLBMSyga5joDfn8yVpI83
         AbvXI0wLSJWtUDseJTqdfE5J3cyQbMG9NjPougvc7hQL89RKr5eN38ziDwgr10QWOCCW
         IfK2AQCfsZAaRrGcHvB6khYuoaEmwk0a8HPRjYmefLw69HUljvau468OvdCpZTGZynRG
         ZJGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW2ELgXZWfBETJc/B28oxsYJDNV4VEuZWYN3um7Hfd375KSIE8O
	0J7oZKJOb3hlqHFZNvhwM8EAefKsaGbdgdiTHbuq9Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwiq6tIQ3HyLk4MV+b/nfss6mYCDQBMvUa5ww4IrPFUMuoJkOhWIDaUNQdwg+Ofz7037Hi/ncA4LIlKTsbnO/A=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:61c3:: with SMTP id v186mr2036244oib.27.1556170454486;
 Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPJUX+paPrD_fsXsbpoUZUcNN2ePA_5H6JvAh4xNOUXPKBKRXw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPJUX+paPrD_fsXsbpoUZUcNN2ePA_5H6JvAh4xNOUXPKBKRXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: jabirm@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:04:03 +0530
Message-ID: <CAPJUX+pmTJkCs9AiYT8SGqymbVggZg4WcxL1_rDgeCMEifN22g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Missing protocols in IHV SCT compared to generic SCT
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002654110587542b79"

--0000000000002654110587542b79
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

There are few applicable protocols which are missing for selection in IHV
SCT e.g. EFI_HII_CONFIG_ACCESS_PROTOCOL, EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_PROTOCOL
when compared to generic SCT.
These protocols can be ported to IHV SCT..
Can anybody help me to understand if there is any limitation/issues for
enabling these protocols for IHV SCT?

Thanks,
Jabir

--0000000000002654110587542b79
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=
=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>There are=
 few applicable protocols which are missing for selection in IHV SCT e.g. E=
FI_HII_CONFIG_ACCESS_PROTOCOL, EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_PROTOCOL when compar=
ed to generic SCT.=C2=A0</div><div>These protocols can be ported to IHV SCT=
..</div><div>Can anybody help me to understand if there is any limitation/i=
ssues for enabling these protocols for IHV SCT?=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><=
div>Thanks,</div><div>Jabir</div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>

--0000000000002654110587542b79--