Re: Missing ‘or’ in CLA

[Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>]

Apologies for the nudge. I was wondering if anyone had had a chance to
ponder this?

Thanks,

Hen

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:08 AM Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> > On 08/31/18 01:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > > The CLA is missing an ‘or’ in section 3.
>> > >
>> > > See https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/133/files for an example
>> of the
>> > > specific text.
>> >
>> > could you please turn this report into a real patch (if the suggested
>> > change is valid)? Technically it's easy enough so I could do it as well,
>> > just so we have something to review on the list, but:
>> > - I have no idea if the suggested change is valid,
>> > - I wasn't around when "Contributions.txt" was originally invented.
>>
>> Would this require a revision bump to 1.2?
>>
>> Whether a valid correction or not, it changes the premises under which
>> certain organisations have confirmed they are happy to contribute.
>> Moreso in my eyes than the change that lead to the bump to 1.1.
>>
>> /
>>     Leif
>
>
> Just as my tuppence - it relaxes rather than tightens the conditions, so
> it’s not a harmful change for those who did notice that the meaning of the
> original Apache ICLA has changed. I postulate that the majority assumed it
> had the same meaning as the Apache ICLA and agreed to that instead.
>
> Hen
>
>
>>