Re: Missing ‘or’ in CLA

[Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:08 AM Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 08/31/18 01:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > The CLA is missing an ‘or’ in section 3.
> > >
> > > See https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/133/files for an example
> of the
> > > specific text.
> >
> > could you please turn this report into a real patch (if the suggested
> > change is valid)? Technically it's easy enough so I could do it as well,
> > just so we have something to review on the list, but:
> > - I have no idea if the suggested change is valid,
> > - I wasn't around when "Contributions.txt" was originally invented.
>
> Would this require a revision bump to 1.2?
>
> Whether a valid correction or not, it changes the premises under which
> certain organisations have confirmed they are happy to contribute.
> Moreso in my eyes than the change that lead to the bump to 1.1.
>
> /
>     Leif


Just as my tuppence - it relaxes rather than tightens the conditions, so
it’s not a harmful change for those who did notice that the meaning of the
original Apache ICLA has changed. I postulate that the majority assumed it
had the same meaning as the Apache ICLA and agreed to that instead.

Hen


>