From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235; helo=mail-io0-x235.google.com; envelope-from=flamefew@gmail.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCE321106C99 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id y12-v6so1288442ioj.13 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rjv5HHighA3msK5SPQKN2t67Ic3NS46ylc1i3CwBRRY=; b=d4N+z6EopjtPmC78RBorPB0jG01T/LVrrr7S/EHIODzu4A00YiqMI2dXc0cyRtdBtm QyZrEYVT/ZQqlL11NmJl2gbhXguSUrFA0p6O0NfZErKrndN4Rq3BZ/IxXWjM2lDgBXQw DEN0zEABYgnjDvD0Q1o6aio7Lj+bboptDez4jJzKjQ8Y+HKBd6BY5u2khV6+MiGkzcbo qQ3Jy7sl8/S589zOq2j6DkIkxCwSy7R6pVt0pHMeptjvdrAqMA8rj9HuDMIyEdSrc8K8 n6UEK1taKQkl8XJksV7pU5xRjUIsLeS6HC72IXEsacg5k9D16WSTj7B0TdLDzOf2lrSW sAqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rjv5HHighA3msK5SPQKN2t67Ic3NS46ylc1i3CwBRRY=; b=Ieok1TUxVRp2hbNduIJSMuu9TSZCtkj01f0zzZjRy58KD5L3eSX/lEC17jEKHMmHjO G7KzSw5BIILytBnHUrEoCQP2N5tZDPqCBh4z1PPvkyPfeouUbN9qs629ubmBBR1TuLsT IHgp060kcHcsqslVI79kWSKyN9R8ETvVl87Nboos6QMYTvtaGDyWA9lETieIVecYoRr9 scP9ssf3+NBMxEwLWbmwQanbwKbAqpTe1fnWfC5gbd5SPhNdbUPwQ/tfNdLC5dMQtgkZ wWmDyuYI3LoFAjL8KDwbACTxHIExfltJeVanKvg70PoyaW4VsNUX82UTw+q8NgoHfsTw UlSg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CdFeTR0U0G5zwtNEnDSqyMADGRzoRG4xY4uT5kMx7jwyx6r9Du OjngJeYsT4/BpySnA36OK4JxEZvaH//cB2xyrxQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaThx4U3ITGuZSW4avEyjz5G1cykp3fqY3W5vPe8+7oeH+3brstx8dOimxrz2a4WKt9KPW487xpNIh4YrDzOTo= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b44e:: with SMTP id d75-v6mr5362223iof.63.1536011061870; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180903110852.xxm4enjitebmisbf@bivouac.eciton.net> In-Reply-To: <20180903110852.xxm4enjitebmisbf@bivouac.eciton.net> From: Henri Yandell Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:44:10 -0700 Message-ID: To: Leif Lindholm Cc: Andrew Fish , "Cetola, Stephano" , "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" , Laszlo Ersek , Michael Kinney , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IE1pc3Npbmcg4oCYb3LigJkgaW4gQ0xB?= X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 21:44:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:08 AM Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > On 08/31/18 01:58, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > The CLA is missing an =E2=80=98or=E2=80=99 in section 3. > > > > > > See https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/133/files for an example > of the > > > specific text. > > > > could you please turn this report into a real patch (if the suggested > > change is valid)? Technically it's easy enough so I could do it as well= , > > just so we have something to review on the list, but: > > - I have no idea if the suggested change is valid, > > - I wasn't around when "Contributions.txt" was originally invented. > > Would this require a revision bump to 1.2? > > Whether a valid correction or not, it changes the premises under which > certain organisations have confirmed they are happy to contribute. > Moreso in my eyes than the change that lead to the bump to 1.1. > > / > Leif Just as my tuppence - it relaxes rather than tightens the conditions, so it=E2=80=99s not a harmful change for those who did notice that the meaning= of the original Apache ICLA has changed. I postulate that the majority assumed it had the same meaning as the Apache ICLA and agreed to that instead. Hen >