From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e; helo=mail-it0-x22e.google.com; envelope-from=flamefew@gmail.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1908721131DAB for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u13-v6so5008446iti.1 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:25:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0U0JEF2ksc7/LQbYTGGUUAjV1pHkutKVgK3X6mbYn3I=; b=uGZfcUKWA05mDIPYiifmKYloUJ+p4jJJpWKOXs+wf7vJc6QKx5qTbSMv+2b17wBh3d xXDOMNc06hu7y6fKEHD23duhwaPfuZNm0/Be5N9JLbAwdTPCXZvfs2xICCRGLe7TiVXH MPjrOnmK0XY4n3OMkgTu76KLlfGOImZOAqM++dvb3v+4ScVYJJyum0a/mry/ufutkfJ9 6K3pIjUyhEH+u2UIIVgxBzSIEULePYEgzNWA/i4NfMofp3Bk888QfdSAAv+YAhAdIfyl 6z307M1t9CCJtHjAXZbboFdMqnbNT/o0ilqexVzNc9YGeKGBwA/Xs5WAawtDXEOeMPVN HPfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0U0JEF2ksc7/LQbYTGGUUAjV1pHkutKVgK3X6mbYn3I=; b=UdUkYcwlHHwFAPqfhTHnbC6B5S5ESxOxZxHs+fRcCZiBQF+oEvVOfkK5ipqIBvXoOU 9Ua7jRo+3j1w4kgKbMAfpLB0oRp3VN61DCvdb2AGsM18QQpBLPj7GOVZutivzteZhGZ0 E42WOARnwfkCgiCk8Pp4e+PJzBp8CQHnQSGQSeq9VhYadA0ipkmJApUX4ZdVZ/A4IUGP N4dP2YPHOw+exCi6B4p7oC+uTxTp21SQfAG5xOZygYuBlIcEQurRBOQFZFn9NLDAUF4+ iP2VIQPXFqmCKpV8uw/FvrFke1yJvho8sv3oXoP2a7EDR8zuR8dk5pZYgtNU7YN3Oz2D b4Ig== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51C5fzmOhTfRKdhYTaAAYDFJSG6M++T5vkId45ZXinSQ8Mbu1PMW nzYeJQifyaEndioVo0unDqP3ZBK8hoyaHxZoQBA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZgEg5TY0qqyKgz2AwFylX60O4327Srvh+Y8hxXXkdlGmxMWswJeDlM7YAZE2eMoG81xB2b757ERlBMEKuEGvk= X-Received: by 2002:a02:8484:: with SMTP id f4-v6mr14308823jai.120.1536981936951; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:25:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180903110852.xxm4enjitebmisbf@bivouac.eciton.net> In-Reply-To: From: Henri Yandell Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:25:26 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Kinney, Michael D" Cc: Andrew Fish , "Cetola, Stephano" , "Justen, Jordan L" , Laszlo Ersek , Leif Lindholm , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IE1pc3Npbmcg4oCYb3LigJkgaW4gQ0xB?= X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 03:25:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Michael. Should I read the text as a logical OR or an AND? ie) does EDK2 feel the current text is unchanged in effect from the Apache ICLA or that the text is intentionally changed in effect from the Apache ICLA so that both clauses apply on each contribution? Thanks, Hen On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:38 PM Kinney, Michael D < michael.d.kinney@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > After review, we do not think this change is required. > > If there are other reasons to update the agreement in the > future, we can include this update at that time. > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] > > On Behalf Of Henri Yandell > > Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 3:35 PM > > To: Leif Lindholm > > Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2- > > devel@lists.01.org; Andrew Fish ; Cetola, > > Stephano ; Kinney, Michael D > > ; Laszlo Ersek > > > > Subject: Re: [edk2] Missing =E2=80=98or=E2=80=99 in CLA > > > > Apologies for the nudge. I was wondering if anyone had had > > a chance to > > ponder this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hen > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM Henri Yandell > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:08 AM Leif Lindholm > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek > > wrote: > > >> > On 08/31/18 01:58, Henri Yandell wrote: > > >> > > The CLA is missing an =E2=80=98or=E2=80=99 in section 3. > > >> > > > > >> > > See > > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/133/files for an > > example > > >> of the > > >> > > specific text. > > >> > > > >> > could you please turn this report into a real patch > > (if the suggested > > >> > change is valid)? Technically it's easy enough so I > > could do it as well, > > >> > just so we have something to review on the list, but: > > >> > - I have no idea if the suggested change is valid, > > >> > - I wasn't around when "Contributions.txt" was > > originally invented. > > >> > > >> Would this require a revision bump to 1.2? > > >> > > >> Whether a valid correction or not, it changes the > > premises under which > > >> certain organisations have confirmed they are happy to > > contribute. > > >> Moreso in my eyes than the change that lead to the bump > > to 1.1. > > >> > > >> / > > >> Leif > > > > > > > > > Just as my tuppence - it relaxes rather than tightens > > the conditions, so > > > it=E2=80=99s not a harmful change for those who did notice that > > the meaning of the > > > original Apache ICLA has changed. I postulate that the > > majority assumed it > > > had the same meaning as the Apache ICLA and agreed to > > that instead. > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > edk2-devel mailing list > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel >