From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"daniel.thompson@linaro.org" <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BaseTools/tools_def AARCH64 ARM: disable PIE linking for .aslc sources
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPv3WKcDJauOgR5GFsAbrB8buipxYEBuYWvywV12xXrg_dZrYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-X8kSai_7ZzhGxvO0Vo8xY2GDpuBzQefYWieJ5-aE5Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ard,
With both PIE disabling patches for AARCH64, when compiling ACPI tables with
gcc-linaro-5.3.1-2016.05-x86_64_aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-
I get following errors:
[...]
aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-no-pie'
Do I understand correctly, that I should either revert those patches
or upgrade to the newer toolchain?
Best regards,
Marcin
2017-11-01 16:18 GMT+01:00 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>:
> On 1 November 2017 at 15:13, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>
>
> Thanks - pushed as 3380a591232de2ab3007ab051010a67c3d000d1c
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 11:01 PM
>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Zhu, Yonghong
>>> <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
>>> Cc: daniel.thompson@linaro.org; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools/tools_def AARCH64 ARM: disable PIE linking for .aslc sources
>>>
>>> Commit 1894a7c64c0a ("BaseTools/tools_def AARCH64 ARM: disable PIE
>>> linking") works around an issue that was caught due to the fact that
>>> PIE linking produces broken .acpi files. However, v2 of that fix
>>> inadvertently only applied the workaround to the normal linker command
>>> line, and not to the ASLD one, so the issue still persists.
>>>
>>> So add the missing -no-pie options for ASLD on ARM and AARCH64.
>>>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template b/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
>>> index 98df0ffc9294..aebd7d558633 100755
>>> --- a/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
>>> +++ b/BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
>>> @@ -4498,8 +4498,8 @@ DEFINE GCC5_ARM_DLINK_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_ARM_DLINK_FLAGS) -no-pie
>>> DEFINE GCC5_ARM_DLINK2_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_ARM_DLINK2_FLAGS) -Wno-error
>>> DEFINE GCC5_AARCH64_DLINK_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_AARCH64_DLINK_FLAGS) -no-pie
>>> DEFINE GCC5_AARCH64_DLINK2_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_AARCH64_DLINK2_FLAGS) -Wno-error
>>> -DEFINE GCC5_ARM_ASLDLINK_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_ARM_ASLDLINK_FLAGS)
>>> -DEFINE GCC5_AARCH64_ASLDLINK_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_AARCH64_ASLDLINK_FLAGS)
>>> +DEFINE GCC5_ARM_ASLDLINK_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_ARM_ASLDLINK_FLAGS) -no-pie
>>> +DEFINE GCC5_AARCH64_ASLDLINK_FLAGS = DEF(GCC49_AARCH64_ASLDLINK_FLAGS) -no-pie
>>>
>>> ####################################################################################
>>> #
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-01 15:01 [PATCH] BaseTools/tools_def AARCH64 ARM: disable PIE linking for .aslc sources Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-01 15:13 ` Gao, Liming
2017-11-01 15:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 14:38 ` Marcin Wojtas [this message]
2017-11-16 14:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 15:07 ` Marcin Wojtas
2017-11-16 15:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 15:31 ` Gao, Liming
2017-11-16 15:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-21 12:06 ` Marcin Wojtas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPv3WKcDJauOgR5GFsAbrB8buipxYEBuYWvywV12xXrg_dZrYA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox