From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::242; helo=mail-it0-x242.google.com; envelope-from=mw@semihalf.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-it0-x242.google.com (mail-it0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91880221EA0B9 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it0-x242.google.com with SMTP id b5so17283679itc.3 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:11:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eBb1UGMU6qkJk2u+6ZA+E0HQ3j3SBmimkPW2f+iw5Ps=; b=vXck5NwDYULLd1XqhjaqKVkUFSNZIBLjEunKBzRW1aIx56YwzsJjWeO612PYG+Dw4d RBKL+F4vSCmGMfy9ypv+uj3X9Z1qSh/hfsKcI4AYvpdfEQVR3grAs5NuDxXoW1mv5ucK pdXU6B5g5QarXWNYyBjKhl8be6ACkuH3hL2ygNKJfdpjWoG0zwCKo/fiWj3tfP4DDjiS xEPBWVuywMbGxj2/Me0MuCMajOHfn7bKUMz7VAtjShdxGpIQZ+CY35wvVldhcn1Fwr6s ohZex8kB/I8Q346gErJHEiy+GwwdiOaUTlyszyMKNL/Frf5QDra1uxVTQUl67I7lTs5d s8Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eBb1UGMU6qkJk2u+6ZA+E0HQ3j3SBmimkPW2f+iw5Ps=; b=Ep1sLFRQ7WmzYJ0bNuVRUpEMSb2g2AIRgSw3hSx1kFUSdgq22mTA1Gdvebbysum7mG 7qDrDqUzRHvDNmq2GckyCL22MhxLl/JXws4aBfRkZl6BhTkgPJlQn5fDumMlmC/GaRXA FHVtpjVVIljHwuaxvWgILAvqcu49j6WM0/K8+ln68UXvg9THY9wRXG4vkNtWJNKbImIO Nsb89feSKF2GzLzQgaSWnDMRzujWoZGn+VFbdhqascX6H/r7nSgwaOwB2aXzh492Q9Ui rf82E59kjg4F1l4kZLvgfBiYhLWjLt1SopcWA7Byw9ViuLieqpc+zgiTyxwFeX/cSRLN KZfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJTEpMUylMGpEDAFpoZp5bJPtxlNg1Fq1ZJDRuP4KVDWNc9Tix1 T6EZqVC0bqi/c0+UHy9cXSK0imDgb5EH0WZcBmTqQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYrXwwoNjb1D+tNQ+TOuq25if+h6bwH1IT9k7/465GLwc4xj06dBHdMetR020Ptmg8bVrkV0W9rq7StzVT1d8Q= X-Received: by 10.107.70.25 with SMTP id t25mr4105490ioa.187.1512673877382; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:11:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.132.164 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:11:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1512664312-23574-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> From: Marcin Wojtas Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 20:11:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Leif Lindholm , Nadav Haklai , Neta Zur Hershkovits , Kostya Porotchkin , Hua Jing , =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIETEhWJyb8Wb?= Subject: Re: [platforms: PATCH 0/5] Armada 7k/8k files reorganization X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:06:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2017-12-07 20:07 GMT+01:00 Ard Biesheuvel : > On 7 December 2017 at 19:06, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >> Hi Ard, >> >> 2017-12-07 17:48 GMT+01:00 Ard Biesheuvel : >>> On 7 December 2017 at 16:31, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I submit a long awaited file reorganization of Marvell Armada 7k/8k >>>> SoC family support. Armada 70x0 DB files remained in >>>> 'Platform/Marvell', SoC files, drivers, libraries, etc. were >>>> shifted to 'Silicon/Marvell'. >>>> >>>> Although there are no functional changes, other most significant >>>> modifications are: >>>> - use 'Armada7k8k' name/prefix, reflecting the SoC family properly >>>> - use 'Armada70x0Db' for a board files >>>> - move and rename the SPI master driver >>>> - move and rename the PciEmulation driver >>>> - rename output fd file for Armada70x0Db >>>> >>>> More details can be found in the commit log. In order to get a >>>> better overview, please check 'tree' command outputs below. >>>> >>>> The code is available in the github: >>>> https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-platform/commits/reorg-upstream-r20171207 >>>> >>>> I'm looking forward to your feedback. >>>> >>> >>> Hi Marcin, >>> >>> Could you regenerate these patches with rename detection please? >>> >> >> For every single operation I used 'git mv'. 'git status' showed the >> renaming properly and so does 'git show -M' on my branch. I'll search >> for better 'git format-patch' generation, but if you know the trick, >> please share. >> > > git format-patch -M does not work for you? 'git format-patch --find-renames' works fine. I'll issue v2 right away. Thanks, Marcin