From: "Marcin Wojtas" <mw@semihalf.com>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"jsd@semihalf.com" <jsd@semihalf.com>,
"jaz@semihalf.com" <jaz@semihalf.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Return error when the device is not present
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:11:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPv3WKedA=KDF2jYCtRgJNY60-ad6Q26npeJhaBdNnH9Jk91jw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C914B17@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3662 bytes --]
Hi Hao,
pt., 2 sie 2019 o 03:04 Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com> napisał(a):
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Ni,
> > Ray
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2019 12:51 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; mw@semihalf.com
> > Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org; ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org;
> jsd@semihalf.com;
> > jaz@semihalf.com; Tian, Feng; Kinney, Michael D; Gao, Liming;
> > lersek@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Return error
> > when the device is not present
> >
> > Marcin,
> > What does the failure look like without your fix?
>
>
> From my observation of the code:
>
> A. Changes are made in UsbEnumerateNewDev();
> B. Caller of UsbEnumerateNewDev(): UsbEnumeratePort();
> C. UsbEnumeratePort() directly returns the status from UsbEnumerateNewDev()
> as its own return value;
> D. Callers of UsbEnumeratePort(): UsbHubEnumeration() and
> UsbRootHubEnumeration();
> E. Both of them do not care about the return status from
> UsbEnumeratePort().
>
> I think there is no direct failure without the proposed fix.
> However, let us wait the confirmation from Marcin.
>
>
Indeed, the code path guarantees that nothing is done with the
UsbEnumeratePort() Status. The patch is not a fix for the upstream code,
however current behavior was problematic for a solution I was implementing
on top of it (i.e. disabling USB hot-plug feature for a certain platform).
Best regards,
Marcin
> Also, I think the proposed patch is a good refinement. If future updates to
> the driver requires checking the return status during the above code path,
> then proper status will be returned.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hao Wu
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ray
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
> > Marcin Wojtas
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 2:25 PM
> > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org; ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org;
> > mw@semihalf.com; jsd@semihalf.com; jaz@semihalf.com; Tian, Feng
> > > <feng.tian@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> > Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>;
> > > lersek@redhat.com
> > > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Return error
> > when the device is not present
> > >
> > > Until now, during the USB device enumeration when its PortState
> > > USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION bit was not set, the stack was not
> > informed
> > > that the device is not present. Fix that by returning appropriate
> > > error code.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: I588f82b987993e9755f64ce76cde9eb690ef1d54
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
> > > ---
> > > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbEnumer.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbEnumer.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbEnumer.c
> > > index be9d9bd..ab1db15 100644
> > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbEnumer.c
> > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbEnumer.c
> > > @@ -719,6 +719,7 @@ UsbEnumerateNewDev (
> > >
> > > if (!USB_BIT_IS_SET (PortState.PortStatus,
> > USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION)) {
> > > DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "UsbEnumerateNewDev: No device present at
> > port %d\n", Port));
> > > + Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
> > > goto ON_ERROR;
> > > } else if (USB_BIT_IS_SET (PortState.PortStatus,
> > USB_PORT_STAT_SUPER_SPEED)){
> > > Child->Speed = EFI_USB_SPEED_SUPER;
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5973 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 6:25 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Return error when the device is not present Marcin Wojtas
2019-07-31 11:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-02 1:05 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2019-07-31 16:51 ` Ni, Ray
2019-08-02 1:03 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-08-02 7:11 ` Marcin Wojtas [this message]
2019-08-05 1:37 ` Wu, Hao A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPv3WKedA=KDF2jYCtRgJNY60-ad6Q26npeJhaBdNnH9Jk91jw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox