From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
To: hao.a.wu@intel.com
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
nadavh@marvell.com, "jsd@semihalf.com" <jsd@semihalf.com>,
Tomasz Michalec <tm@semihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:25:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPv3WKexZh6iVZpXPh3yowbJuy2Fwh7cUs43rowx2+DwM_NcLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C84C662@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Hao,
wt., 13 lis 2018 o 08:38 Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> Hi Marcin,
>
> The code changes look good to me.
>
> Could you please grant me some time for some additional tests for these
> patches?
Sure.
> I will inform you with the results sometime next week. Thanks in advance.
>
Ard gave his RB to 2/4 and 3/4. Moreover he pointed a typo in 3/4
commit message - should I repost, or could those be included when
applying the patches (unless you don't request any code change, of
course)?
Best regards,
Marcin
> Best Regards,
> Hao Wu
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marcin Wojtas [mailto:mw@semihalf.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 7:01 AM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Wu, Hao A; Kinney, Michael D; Gao, Liming;
> > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; nadavh@marvell.com; mw@semihalf.com;
> > jsd@semihalf.com; tm@semihalf.com; jaz@semihalf.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Although I could've waited for Hao's remarks, I think it may
> > be better if he takes a look at much cleaner code, which
> > addresses v3 review comments.
> > The newest version of the patchset cleans-up significantly
> > patches 2&3 by removing code duplication and other minor
> > improvements.
> >
> > Patches are available in the github:
> > https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-
> > platform/commits/sdmmc-override-upstream-r20181109
> >
> > Please note that extending SdMmcOverride protocol was impacting
> > so far the only user of it (Synquacer controller). In paralel
> > edk2-platforms patchset, a patch can be found:
> > ("Silicon/SynQuacer/PlatformDxe: adjust to updated SdMmcOverride")
> > which adjust to the new API.
> > https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-
> > platform/commits/xenon-upstream-r20181109
> >
> > I'm looking forward to the comments and remarks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Marcin
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v3->v4
> > * 2/4:
> > - avoid duplication by calling SdMmcOverride callback in
> > SdMmcHcUhsSignaling
> >
> > * 3/4:
> > - avoid duplication by calling SdMmcOverride callback in
> > EmmcSwitchClockFreq
> >
> > * 4/4:
> > - add Ard's RB
> >
> > v2->v3
> > * 1/4:
> > - rename new parameter to PhaseData
> > - add Ard's RB
> >
> > * 2/4:
> > - s/Controler/Controller/
> > - remove all references to MMC_SDR_50 mode
> > - rename and reorder MMC bus modes
> > - rename enum: s/SD_MMC_UHS_TIMING/SD_MMC_BUS_MODE/
> > and move it to protocol header in order to drop including private one
> > - fix if condition in EmmcSwitchToHighSpeed
> > - call SdMmcHcUhsSignaling unconditionally before SdMmcOverride
> > callback, so that protocol producer can optionally modify only quirky
> > timing mode values.
> >
> > *4/4
> > - bump protocol version to 2
> > - remove redundant assert from SdMmcPciHcDriverBindingStart
> > (BaseClkFreq is already checked in SdMmcHcInitClockFreq)
> > - update comment in SdMmcHcInitClockFreq
> > - restore original DumpCapabilityReg and append
> >
> > v1 -> v2
> > * Rebase onto newest master
> > * 1/4 [new patch] - preparation for extending NotifyPhase
> > * 2/4 - UhsSignaling as a part of NotifyPhase
> > * 3/4 - SwitchClockFreqPost as a part of NotifyPhase
> > * 4/4 - Allow updating BaseClkFreq via Capability instead of the
> > independent callback.
> >
> >
> > Marcin Wojtas (2):
> > MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add an optional parameter in NotifyPhase
> > MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Allow overriding base clock frequency
> >
> > Tomasz Michalec (2):
> > MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add UhsSignaling to SdMmcOverride
> > protocol
> > MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add SwitchClockFreqPost to
> > SdMmcOverride
> >
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h | 6 +
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h | 42 ++++++-
> > MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h | 29 ++++-
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/EmmcDevice.c | 121 ++++++++++-
> > --------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c | 35 ++++--
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c | 13 +-
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c | 124
> > +++++++++++++++++---
> > 7 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-09 23:01 [PATCH v4 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-09 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add an optional parameter in NotifyPhase Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-09 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add UhsSignaling to SdMmcOverride protocol Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-12 10:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Add SwitchClockFreqPost to SdMmcOverride Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-12 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: Allow overriding base clock frequency Marcin Wojtas
2018-11-13 7:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] SdMmcOverride extension Wu, Hao A
2018-11-13 8:25 ` Marcin Wojtas [this message]
2018-11-13 8:29 ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-20 5:58 ` Wu, Hao A
2018-11-20 7:22 ` Marcin Wojtas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPv3WKexZh6iVZpXPh3yowbJuy2Fwh7cUs43rowx2+DwM_NcLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox