From: "Michael D Kinney via groups.io" <michael.d.kinney=intel.com@groups.io>
To: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"leif.lindholm@oss.qualcomm.com" <leif.lindholm@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Removal of VS2015 (and maybe VS2017) and deprecated toolchains (GCC48, GCC49, GCC5)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:08:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4929113C604798DC381237C0D2232@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4adf63f9-1fcd-4ec1-9c23-fe69efb2ab89@bsdio.com>
Hi Rebecca,
Yes. I have collected feedback. I have found some use of these toolchains.
I do not have a date when the move to newer toolchains will be completed.
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 9:05 PM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io; leif.lindholm@oss.qualcomm.com
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Removal of VS2015 (and maybe VS2017) and
> deprecated toolchains (GCC48, GCC49, GCC5)
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> I was wondering if you'd been able to collect any feedback or review the
> proposal?
>
>
> Rebecca
>
>
> On 10/23/24 9:23 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will need more time to review this impacts of this proposal.
> >
> > Can we extend the timeline for comments to mid November.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Leif
> >> Lindholm via groups.io
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 5:15 AM
> >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rebecca@bsdio.com
> >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Removal of VS2015 (and maybe VS2017) and
> >> deprecated toolchains (GCC48, GCC49, GCC5)
> >>
> >> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 12:19, Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com> wrote:
> >>> In addition, since GCC48, GCC49 and GCC5 have been marked deprecated
> >> for
> >>> over a year, I'd like to proceed with removing them as well.
> >>>
> >>> Please provide feedback by Thursday October 31st. In the absence of
> >>> feedback I'll plan to proceed with removing VS2015, GCC48, GCC49 and
> >> GCC5.
> >>
> >> No comment on the VS ones, but for the GCC ones, I'm all for it.
> >>
> >> We might also want to raise an issue on deleting workarounds put into
> >> place for ancient toolchains.
> >> For gcc48/49 that was redundant initialization due to broken
> >> use-uninitialized detection.
> >> e.g.
> >>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/Library/X86QemuLoa
> >> dImageLib/X86QemuLoadImageLib.c#L346
> >>
> >> /
> >> Leif
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#120819): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/120819
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109150018/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-22 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 11:18 [edk2-devel] Removal of VS2015 (and maybe VS2017) and deprecated toolchains (GCC48, GCC49, GCC5) Rebecca Cran
2024-10-22 12:14 ` Leif Lindholm via groups.io
2024-10-24 3:23 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-10-24 5:14 ` Rebecca Cran
2024-11-22 5:05 ` Rebecca Cran
2024-11-22 21:08 ` Michael D Kinney via groups.io [this message]
2024-11-22 22:30 ` Rebecca Cran via groups.io
2024-11-23 0:01 ` Michael D Kinney via groups.io
2024-11-24 17:56 ` Michael D Kinney via groups.io
2024-11-24 19:56 ` Rebecca Cran
2024-10-22 15:53 ` [edk2-devel] [edk2-discuss] " Sean
2024-10-22 17:38 ` Michael D Kinney
2024-10-22 23:16 ` Rebecca Cran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB4929113C604798DC381237C0D2232@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox