public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Jin, Zhi" <zhi.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 02:02:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4929376FD623FDDC87505CFCD2772@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117064510.390499-1-zhi.jin@intel.com>

Hi Zhi,

Some comments below.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Zhi Jin
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 10:45 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Jin, Zhi <zhi.jin@intel.com>; Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>;
> Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle
> validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface
> 
> CoreGetProtocolInterface() is called by CoreOpenProtocol(),
> CoreCloseProtocol() and CoreOpenProtocolInformation().
> Before CoreOpenProtocol() calls CoreGetProtocolInterface(), the input
> parameter UserHandle has been already checked for validation. So does
> CoreCloseProtocol().
> Removing the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface()
> could improve the performance, as CoreOpenProtocol() is called very
> frequently.
> Meanwhile, need to make it the caller's responsibility to check the
> parameters, and add the check in CoreOpenProtocolInformation().
> 
> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> index 51e5b5d3b3..a0d2d03267 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> @@ -916,6 +916,8 @@ CoreUninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces (
> 
>  /**
>    Locate a certain GUID protocol interface in a Handle's protocols.
> +  Note: This function doesn't do parameters checking, it's caller's
> responsibility
> +  to pass in valid parameters.
> 
>    @param  UserHandle             The handle to obtain the protocol
> interface on

Instead of a Note:, I recommend the description of this parameter
be updated to state that the caller must pass in a valid UserHandle
that is checked with CoreValidateHandle().

Also, this API CoreGetProtocolInterface() is an internal helper 
function.  I also recommend that this function be declared 'static'
so the scope of the assumption that UserHandle is valid is only 
by calls from other functions in this same file.

>    @param  Protocol               The GUID of the protocol
> @@ -929,17 +931,11 @@ CoreGetProtocolInterface (
>    IN  EFI_GUID    *Protocol
>    )
>  {
> -  EFI_STATUS          Status;
>    PROTOCOL_ENTRY      *ProtEntry;
>    PROTOCOL_INTERFACE  *Prot;
>    IHANDLE             *Handle;
>    LIST_ENTRY          *Link;
> 
> -  Status = CoreValidateHandle (UserHandle);
> -  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> -    return NULL;
> -  }
> -
>    Handle = (IHANDLE *)UserHandle;
> 
>    //
> @@ -1392,6 +1388,15 @@ CoreOpenProtocolInformation (
>    //
>    CoreAcquireProtocolLock ();
> 
> +  //
> +  // Check for invalid UserHandle
> +  //
> +  Status = CoreValidateHandle (UserHandle);
> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +    Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
> +    goto Done;
> +  }
> +
>    //
>    // Look at each protocol interface for a match
>    //
> --
> 2.39.2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114107): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114107
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103781273/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-20  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-17  6:45 [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface Zhi Jin
2024-01-17  6:45 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg: Optimize CoreConnectSingleController Zhi Jin
2024-01-20  1:53   ` Michael D Kinney
2024-01-20  2:02 ` Michael D Kinney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB4929376FD623FDDC87505CFCD2772@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox