public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"rebecca@bsdio.com" <rebecca@bsdio.com>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:16:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4929A4BAFF5383BB884B627AD2DE9@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540fd56f-269b-5767-613e-67a0321bb1fe@quicinc.com>

I would like to propose removing EBC support from edk2 and BaseTools after 
edk2-stable202302.

Anyone requiring EBC can use edk2-stable202302 or older releases.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 7:20 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; ardb@kernel.org; rebecca@bsdio.com
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Liu, Zhiguang
> <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__
> 
> On 2023-02-10 11:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> I wasn't sure if we cared about EBC builds these days. Given the link on
> >> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/unified-extensible-firmware-interface/efi-homepage-
> general-technology.html
> >> to the compiler goes to a generic page that doesn't mention it, is it
> >> possible to get a copy if I want to verify if changes I'm making are
> >> compatible?
> >
> > We tried to get access to this at Linaro, but I don't think it is
> > still available. Leif may remember better.
> 
> After asking around, some shady character in a café passed me a very
> long and customized URL on a note in a brown paper bag, and I was able
> to procure a single license for ARM. I don't think we succeeded for Linaro.
> 
> > I wonder whether we should simply drop EBC support? It is unlikely
> > that all the changes that went into EDK2 over the years have not
> > caused a single EBC regression in the library components that are
> > needed to build UEFI drivers that target EBC.
> 
> The appearance of RISC-V and Loongarch since those days highlight why
> architecture independent drivers would be a good thing, but EBC is
> pining for the fjords.
> 
> If we don't drop EBC now, we should start drafting a timeline for when
> we will.
> 
> /
>      Leif


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-10 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-09 15:45 [PATCH 1/2] MdePkg: Update Base.h to be compliant with C11 Rebecca Cran
2023-02-09 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] MdePkg: Update code to be more C11 compliant by using __func__ Rebecca Cran
2023-02-10  1:01   ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2023-02-10  1:21     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-02-10 11:45       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-10 15:19         ` Leif Lindholm
2023-02-10 18:16           ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
2023-02-12 19:59     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-14  2:19     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-14 20:40       ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-17 13:31         ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-17 15:16           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-22 16:58             ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-22 17:45               ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-23  0:58                 ` Michael D Kinney
2023-03-23  1:43                   ` Huang, Yanbo
2023-03-23  1:46                     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-17  4:23   ` Sunil V L
2023-02-10  1:03 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdePkg: Update Base.h to be compliant with C11 Michael D Kinney
2023-02-10  1:14   ` Rebecca Cran
2023-02-10  4:15     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-06 16:39 ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-10  2:45   ` 回复: " gaoliming
2023-03-10 17:58     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-13 17:54     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-03-13 20:46       ` Michael D Kinney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB4929A4BAFF5383BB884B627AD2DE9@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox