From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
"Desimone, Nathaniel L" <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>,
"Agyeman, Prince" <prince.agyeman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] [edk2-platforms]Intel/BoardModulePkg: Always sort load option
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:11:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4930E4C130BFFEF89F0BF3738C999@CO1PR11MB4930.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302090342.130-1-zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Zhiguang,
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
I think you can add a third reason in commit message:
3. Below change in UefiBootManagerLib puts setup in the end
MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: Put BootMenu at the end of BootOrder
SHA-1: 7f34681c488aee2563eaa2afcc6a2c8aa7c5b912
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Zhiguang Liu
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 5:04 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Agyeman, Prince <prince.agyeman@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] [edk2-platforms]Intel/BoardModulePkg: Always sort load option
>
> Currently, load option is only sorted when setup is the first priority in boot option.
> This condition is not needed because the below reasons:
> 1. Setup option may have different string name depending on platform side.
> It shouldn't be hardcoded here.
> 2. Always sorting meets the needs that setup should not be the first priority
>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> Cc: Prince Agyeman <prince.agyeman@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> Platform/Intel/BoardModulePkg/Library/BoardBdsHookLib/BoardBdsHookLib.c | 35 +----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Platform/Intel/BoardModulePkg/Library/BoardBdsHookLib/BoardBdsHookLib.c
> b/Platform/Intel/BoardModulePkg/Library/BoardBdsHookLib/BoardBdsHookLib.c
> index d7612fb80a..60acf48dd6 100644
> --- a/Platform/Intel/BoardModulePkg/Library/BoardBdsHookLib/BoardBdsHookLib.c
> +++ b/Platform/Intel/BoardModulePkg/Library/BoardBdsHookLib/BoardBdsHookLib.c
> @@ -992,37 +992,6 @@ ConnectSequence (
> EfiBootManagerConnectAll ();
>
> }
>
>
>
> -
>
> -/**
>
> - The function is to consider the boot order which is not in our expectation.
>
> - In the case that we need to re-sort the boot option.
>
> -
>
> - @retval TRUE Need to sort Boot Option.
>
> - @retval FALSE Don't need to sort Boot Option.
>
> -**/
>
> -BOOLEAN
>
> -IsNeedSortBootOption (
>
> - VOID
>
> - )
>
> -{
>
> - EFI_BOOT_MANAGER_LOAD_OPTION *BootOptions;
>
> - UINTN BootOptionCount;
>
> -
>
> - BootOptions = EfiBootManagerGetLoadOptions (&BootOptionCount, LoadOptionTypeBoot);
>
> -
>
> - //
>
> - // If setup is the first priority in boot option, we need to sort boot option.
>
> - //
>
> - if ((BootOptionCount > 1) &&
>
> - (((StrnCmp (BootOptions->Description, L"Enter Setup", StrLen (L"Enter Setup"))) == 0) ||
>
> - ((StrnCmp (BootOptions->Description, L"BootManagerMenuApp", StrLen (L"BootManagerMenuApp"))) == 0))) {
>
> - return TRUE;
>
> - }
>
> -
>
> - return FALSE;
>
> -}
>
> -
>
> -
>
> /**
>
> Connects Root Bridge
>
> **/
>
> @@ -1383,7 +1352,5 @@ BdsAfterConsoleReadyBeforeBootOptionCallback (
>
>
> EfiBootManagerRefreshAllBootOption ();
>
>
>
> - if (IsNeedSortBootOption()) {
>
> - EfiBootManagerSortLoadOptionVariable (LoadOptionTypeBoot, CompareBootOption);
>
> - }
>
> + EfiBootManagerSortLoadOptionVariable (LoadOptionTypeBoot, CompareBootOption);
>
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.0.windows.2
>
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=
> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#72329): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/72329
> Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81021303/1712937
> Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
> Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [ray.ni@intel.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-02 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 9:03 [PATCH] [edk2-platforms]Intel/BoardModulePkg: Always sort load option Zhiguang Liu
2021-03-02 9:11 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2021-03-02 10:46 ` [edk2-devel] " Gao, Zhichao
2021-03-02 13:53 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB4930E4C130BFFEF89F0BF3738C999@CO1PR11MB4930.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox