From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Sheng, W" <w.sheng@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul1" <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
"Feng, Roger" <roger.feng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix SMM stack offset is not correct
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 05:01:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4930E59DF017E33B175E0D638C9A9@CO1PR11MB4930.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB41667BD6E7BADE2D43D806538C9D9@BY5PR11MB4166.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 8:22 PM
> To: Sheng, W <w.sheng@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo
> Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1 <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>;
> Feng, Roger <roger.feng@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix SMM stack
> offset is not correct
>
> Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sheng, W <w.sheng@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 4:03 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo
> Ersek
> > <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1 <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>; Yao,
> Jiewen
> > <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Feng, Roger <roger.feng@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix SMM stack
> offset is
> > not correct
> >
> > In function InitGdt(), SmiPFHandler() and Gen4GPageTable(), it uses
> > CpuIndex * mSmmStackSize to get the SMM stack address offset for
> > multi processor. It misses the SMM Shadow Stack Size. Each processor
> > will use mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize in the memory.
> > It should use CpuIndex * (mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize) to
> get
> > this SMM stack address offset. If mSmmShadowStackSize > 0 and multi
> > processor enabled, it will get the wrong offset value.
> > CET shadow stack feature will set the value of mSmmShadowStackSize.
> >
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3237
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sheng Wei <w.sheng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Roger Feng <roger.feng@intel.com>
> > ---
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c | 6 ++++--
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c | 4 +++-
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> > index 4bcd217917..6227b2428a 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ SPIN_LOCK *mPFLock = NULL;
> > SMM_CPU_SYNC_MODE mCpuSmmSyncMode;
> > BOOLEAN mMachineCheckSupported = FALSE;
> >
> > +extern UINTN mSmmShadowStackSize;
> > +
> > /**
> > Performs an atomic compare exchange operation to get semaphore.
> > The compare exchange operation must be performed using
> > @@ -920,7 +922,7 @@ Gen4GPageTable (
> > // Add two more pages for known good stack and stack guard page,
> > // then find the lower 2MB aligned address.
> > //
> > - High2MBoundary = (mSmmStackArrayEnd - mSmmStackSize +
> EFI_PAGE_SIZE
> > * 2) & ~(SIZE_2MB-1);
> > + High2MBoundary = (mSmmStackArrayEnd - mSmmStackSize -
> > mSmmShadowStackSize + EFI_PAGE_SIZE * 2) & ~(SIZE_2MB-1);
> > PagesNeeded = ((High2MBoundary - Low2MBoundary) / SIZE_2MB) + 1;
> > }
> > //
> > @@ -971,7 +973,7 @@ Gen4GPageTable (
> > // Mark the guard page as non-present
> > //
> > Pte[Index] = PageAddress | mAddressEncMask;
> > - GuardPage += mSmmStackSize;
> > + GuardPage += (mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize);
> > if (GuardPage > mSmmStackArrayEnd) {
> > GuardPage = 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > index cdc1fcefc5..07e7ea70de 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> > #define PAGE_TABLE_PAGES 8
> > #define ACC_MAX_BIT BIT3
> >
> > +extern UINTN mSmmShadowStackSize;
> > +
> > LIST_ENTRY mPagePool = INITIALIZE_LIST_HEAD_VARIABLE
> > (mPagePool);
> > BOOLEAN m1GPageTableSupport = FALSE;
> > BOOLEAN mCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess;
> > @@ -1037,7 +1039,7 @@ SmiPFHandler (
> > (PFAddress < (mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase +
> mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSize))) {
> > DumpCpuContext (InterruptType, SystemContext);
> > CpuIndex = GetCpuIndex ();
> > - GuardPageAddress = (mSmmStackArrayBase + EFI_PAGE_SIZE +
> CpuIndex *
> > mSmmStackSize);
> > + GuardPageAddress = (mSmmStackArrayBase + EFI_PAGE_SIZE +
> CpuIndex *
> > (mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize));
> > if ((FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuSmmStackGuard)) &&
> > (PFAddress >= GuardPageAddress) &&
> > (PFAddress < (GuardPageAddress + EFI_PAGE_SIZE))) {
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > index 7ef3b1d488..661c1ba294 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ InitGdt (
> > //
> > // Setup top of known good stack as IST1 for each processor.
> > //
> > - *(UINTN *)(TssBase + TSS_X64_IST1_OFFSET) = (mSmmStackArrayBase
> +
> > EFI_PAGE_SIZE + Index * mSmmStackSize);
> > + *(UINTN *)(TssBase + TSS_X64_IST1_OFFSET) =
> (mSmmStackArrayBase +
> > EFI_PAGE_SIZE + Index * (mSmmStackSize + mSmmShadowStackSize));
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.16.2.windows.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-26 8:03 [PATCH v6 0/3] Fix CET shadow stack token busy bit clear issue Sheng Wei
2021-02-26 8:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] MdePkg/Include: Add CET instructions to Nasm.inc Sheng Wei
2021-02-26 8:03 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Clear CET shadow stack token busy bit Sheng Wei
2021-03-01 6:54 ` Ni, Ray
2021-02-26 8:03 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix SMM stack offset is not correct Sheng Wei
2021-02-26 12:21 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-03-01 5:01 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB4930E59DF017E33B175E0D638C9A9@CO1PR11MB4930.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox