public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Min Xu" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"kraxel@redhat.com" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V4 3/3] SecurityPkg: Support CcMeasurementProtocol in DxeTpmMeasurementLib
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:49:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB5058249DD43059FE85ADE57EC58D9@CO1PR11MB5058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB5058471578870897AB97FA03C58D9@CO1PR11MB5058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On November 4, 2021 9:35 PM, Xu Min wrote:
> On November 4, 2021 4:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >
> > > [SAMI] Apologies, I missed this in my previous review. I think the
> > > behaviour if both the TCG2 and CC measurement protocols are
> > > installed would be inconsistent between DxeTpmMeasurementLib and
> > > DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib. The main difference being in the later, the
> > > TCG2 protocol takes precedence for extending the measurement.
> >
> > Yes, we should have consistent behavior in both cases.
> In DxeTpmMeasurementLib, Cc measurement protocol is used as the first try. If
> it fails, then it try to measure with TCG2 / TCG protocol in turn.
> In DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib, TCG2 protocol is used the as the first try. If it fails,
> CC measurement protocol is tried in turn.
> Yes, this is inconsistent. I will update DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib to try Cc
> measurement protocol first, then try TCG2 protocol if Cc measurement protocol
> fails. In this way, only one protocol will be called to do the measurement. But
> TCG2 protocol is the first try, CC measurement protocol is the second try.
> 
> >
> > > I think it would be good to modify DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib so that the
> > > CC measurement protocol is used if both protocols are installed.
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > Does it makes sense to use both protocols?
> Agree with Gerd. I don't think we should use both protocols to do the
> measurement.
> My suggestion is that, first try CC protocol, if it fails, then try TCG2 protocol. Just
> as I explained above.

Another option will be that:
In DxeTpmMeasurementLib the pseudo would look like:
If (CC Protocol is installed) {
  Status = CcMeasureAndLogData (...)
} else {  // below is the original code
 Status = Tpm20MeasureAndLogData (...)    
 If (EFI_ERROR (Status)) { 
    Status = Tpm12MeasureAndLogData (...) 
 }
}

In DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib, the pseudo would look like:
If (CC Protocol is installed) {
    Status = DoCcMeasureBoot(...)
} else if (TCG2 protocol is installed) {
    Status = DoTcg2MeasureBoot(...)
}

Sami & Gerd
What's your thougth?

Thanks
Min

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-04 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-02  2:50 [PATCH V4 0/3] Introduce CcMeasurementProtocol into EDK2 Min Xu
2021-11-02  2:50 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] MdePkg: Introduce CcMeasurementProtocol for CC Guest firmware Min Xu
2021-11-02  6:24   ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-11-02  9:41   ` Sami Mujawar
2021-11-04  5:51   ` 回复: " gaoliming
2021-11-04 12:35     ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2021-11-05  5:20       ` 回复: " gaoliming
2021-11-05  6:22         ` Min Xu
2021-11-02  2:50 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] SecurityPkg: Support CcMeasurementProtocol in DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib Min Xu
2021-11-02  6:24   ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-11-03  2:59     ` Min Xu
2021-11-02  9:43   ` Sami Mujawar
2021-11-05  2:12     ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2021-11-02  2:50 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] SecurityPkg: Support CcMeasurementProtocol in DxeTpmMeasurementLib Min Xu
2021-11-02  6:24   ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-11-03  3:01     ` Min Xu
2021-11-02  9:45   ` Sami Mujawar
2021-11-04  8:20     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-11-04 13:35       ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2021-11-04 13:49         ` Min Xu [this message]
2021-11-04 14:18           ` Sami Mujawar
2021-11-04 14:25             ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-11-05  2:15     ` Min Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB5058249DD43059FE85ADE57EC58D9@CO1PR11MB5058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox