public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhi Jin" <zhi.jin@intel.com>
To: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:13:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB518567B756DB56B018FD67F0F77D2@CO1PR11MB5185.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4929B8FFBB1D82C6457CF7E2D2742@CO1PR11MB4929.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Mike,

	After changing 'STATIC' to 'static', I hit an error from the EccCheck Test as below:
		ERROR - EFI coding style error
		ERROR - *Error code: 5001
		ERROR - *Return type of a function should exist and in the first line
		ERROR - *file: /.../Build/.pytool/Plugin/EccCheck/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
		ERROR - *Line number: 928
		ERROR - *[CoreGetProtocolInterface] Return Type should appear at the start of line

	Looks like 'STATIC' is treated as a modifier by EccCheck, while 'static' is not.
	In BaseTools/Source/Python/Ecc/config.ini:
		ModifierList = IN, OUT, OPTIONAL, UNALIGNED, EFI_RUNTIMESERVICE, EFI_BOOTSERVICE, EFIAPI, TPMINTERNALAPI, STATIC

	Should we add 'static' to ModifierList to fix this?

BRs
Zhi Jin

-----Original Message-----
From: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 6:22 AM
To: Jin, Zhi <zhi.jin@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface

Hi Zhi,

Thanks for the update.  One minor comment on 'STATIC' should be 'static'.

We no longer depend on macros to redefine 'STATIC' and it is better to
just used the standard C 'static' form.

With that change:

Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>


Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jin, Zhi <zhi.jin@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 1:53 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Jin, Zhi <zhi.jin@intel.com>; Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>;
> Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check
> in CoreGetProtocolInterface
> 
> CoreGetProtocolInterface() is called by CoreOpenProtocol(),
> CoreCloseProtocol() and CoreOpenProtocolInformation().
> Before CoreOpenProtocol() calls CoreGetProtocolInterface(), the input
> parameter UserHandle has been already checked for validation. So does
> CoreCloseProtocol().
> Removing the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface()
> could improve the performance, as CoreOpenProtocol() is called very
> frequently.
> To ensure the assumption that the caller of CoreGetProtocolInterface()
> must pass in a valid UserHandle that is checked with
> CoreValidateHandle(),
> add the parameter check in CoreOpenProtocolInformation(), and declare
> CoreGetProtocolInterface() as static.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>   1. Update the description of UserHandle to state that the caller
>      must pass in a valid UserHandle that is checked with
>      CoreValidateHandle().
>   2. Declare CoreGetProtocolInterface() as static.
> 
> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> index 51e5b5d3b3..24e4fbf5f3 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> @@ -918,28 +918,25 @@ CoreUninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces (
>    Locate a certain GUID protocol interface in a Handle's protocols.
> 
>    @param  UserHandle             The handle to obtain the protocol
> interface on
> +                                 The caller must pass in a valid
> UserHandle that
> +                                 is checked with CoreValidateHandle().
>    @param  Protocol               The GUID of the protocol
> 
>    @return The requested protocol interface for the handle
> 
>  **/
> +STATIC
>  PROTOCOL_INTERFACE  *
>  CoreGetProtocolInterface (
>    IN  EFI_HANDLE  UserHandle,
>    IN  EFI_GUID    *Protocol
>    )
>  {
> -  EFI_STATUS          Status;
>    PROTOCOL_ENTRY      *ProtEntry;
>    PROTOCOL_INTERFACE  *Prot;
>    IHANDLE             *Handle;
>    LIST_ENTRY          *Link;
> 
> -  Status = CoreValidateHandle (UserHandle);
> -  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> -    return NULL;
> -  }
> -
>    Handle = (IHANDLE *)UserHandle;
> 
>    //
> @@ -1392,6 +1389,15 @@ CoreOpenProtocolInformation (
>    //
>    CoreAcquireProtocolLock ();
> 
> +  //
> +  // Check for invalid UserHandle
> +  //
> +  Status = CoreValidateHandle (UserHandle);
> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +    Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
> +    goto Done;
> +  }
> +
>    //
>    // Look at each protocol interface for a match
>    //
> --
> 2.39.2



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114766): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114766
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103883257/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-30  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22  9:53 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface Zhi Jin
2024-01-22  9:53 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] MdeModulePkg: Optimize CoreConnectSingleController Zhi Jin
2024-01-31  1:27   ` 回复: " gaoliming via groups.io
2024-01-23 22:22 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] MdeModulePkg: Remove the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface Michael D Kinney
2024-01-30  9:13   ` Zhi Jin [this message]
2024-01-30 17:56     ` Michael D Kinney
2024-01-31  2:22       ` Zhi Jin
2024-01-31  5:06 ` 回复: " gaoliming via groups.io
2024-02-02  6:04   ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB518567B756DB56B018FD67F0F77D2@CO1PR11MB5185.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox