Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] RISC-V QEMU virtual package

["Abner Chang" <abner.chang@hpe.com>]

Ok thanks, do we need the two steps to migrate FDT modules under OvmfPkg/?
1. One patch set to clone  those modules under OvmfPkg/
2. One patch set of ArmVirtPkg change to use those modules and deletes the ones under ArmVirtPkg/.

Or we just do all at once? I prefer to have two steps. How do you think?

Another question, who would like to be the reviewers of OvmfPkg/Fdt/*? Any volunteers from CC list?

Thanks
Abner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kraxel@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 8:19 PM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW
> Technologist) <abner.chang@hpe.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; gaoliming
> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>;
> Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif@nuviainc.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Schaefer, Daniel
> <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>; Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>; Ard
> Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] RISC-V QEMU virtual package
> 
>   Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:04:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:44, Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think it makes sense to put Fdt to OvmfPkg. I suggest an Fdt folder and
> put all things there.
> > >
> > > I also think we define Fdt feature in
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/Maintainers.txt to add
> reviewer there to help review the code.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed.
> 
> Agreeing too.
> 
> take care,
>   Gerd