From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"Lou, Yun" <yun.lou@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul1" <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg: Cpu feature data stored in memory may be migrated
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:35:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR1101MB20723A4F8E5F7466B212D6F98CAA9@CY4PR1101MB2072.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52582ED74205B9C144CA60E7FEA99@BN9PR11MB5258.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Eric,
it's related to how pool/page memory is allocated in PEI.
The PEI pool is allocated in HOB. HOB data is migrated by DXE core to a new location. The migration guarantees the HOB data is kept but doesn't fix up the ACPI_CPU_DATA pointer that points to the HOB data.
The PEI page is allocated between Phit->FreeMemoryTop and Phit->MemoryTop. The location is not changed in DXE.
Thanks,
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 10:36 PM
> To: Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1 <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg: Cpu feature data stored in memory may be migrated
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you help to explain more why PeiAllocatePages does not have the problem while PeiAllocatePool has?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 7:53 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Rahul1 <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg: Cpu feature data stored in memory may be migrated
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3634
>
> The memory allocated through "PeiAllocatePool" is located in HOB, and
> in DXE phase, the HOB will be migrated to a different location.
> After the migration, the data stored in the HOB stays the same, but the
> address of pointer to the memory(such as the pointers in ACPI_CPU_DATA
> structure) changes, which may cause "PiSmmCpuDxeSmm" driver can't find
> the memory(the pointers in ACPI_CPU_DATA structure) that allocated in
> "PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib", so use "PeiAllocatePages" to allocate
> memory instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> index 6e2ab79518..e9eba64914 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ CpuInitDataInitialize (
> CpuFeaturesData->AcpiCpuData= AcpiCpuData;
>
>
>
> CpuStatus = &AcpiCpuData->CpuFeatureInitData.CpuStatus;
>
> - Location = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (EFI_CPU_PHYSICAL_LOCATION) * NumberOfCpus);
>
> + Location = AllocatePages (EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (sizeof (EFI_CPU_PHYSICAL_LOCATION) * NumberOfCpus));
>
> ASSERT (Location != NULL);
>
> AcpiCpuData->CpuFeatureInitData.ApLocation = (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)Location;
>
>
>
> @@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ CpuInitDataInitialize (
> //
>
> // Collect valid core count in each package because not all cores are valid.
>
> //
>
> - ThreadCountPerPackage = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (UINT32) * CpuStatus->PackageCount);
>
> + ThreadCountPerPackage = AllocatePages (EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (sizeof (UINT32) * CpuStatus->PackageCount));
>
> ASSERT (ThreadCountPerPackage != NULL);
>
> CpuStatus->ThreadCountPerPackage = (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)ThreadCountPerPackage;
>
>
>
> - ThreadCountPerCore = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (UINT8) * CpuStatus->PackageCount * CpuStatus->MaxCoreCount);
>
> + ThreadCountPerCore = AllocatePages (EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (sizeof (UINT8) * CpuStatus->PackageCount * CpuStatus-
> >MaxCoreCount));
>
> ASSERT (ThreadCountPerCore != NULL);
>
> CpuStatus->ThreadCountPerCore = (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)ThreadCountPerCore;
>
>
>
> --
> 2.28.0.windows.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 11:53 [PATCH v1] UefiCpuPkg: Cpu feature data stored in memory may be migrated Jason Lou
2021-09-29 14:11 ` Ni, Ray
2021-09-29 14:36 ` Dong, Eric
2021-09-30 7:35 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CY4PR1101MB20723A4F8E5F7466B212D6F98CAA9@CY4PR1101MB2072.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox