Correct. It’s possible that we can have some sort of test reunion at some point, but SCT is largely for interfaces and spec compliance, and the UnitTest Framework is for implementation business logic, CI, and code coverage.

- Bret

From: Tiger Liu(BJ-RD) via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:17 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)
Subject: [外部] Re: [edk2-devel] question about UnitTest Framework

Hi,
After studying previous discuss mail, UnitTest Framework is work for Continuous Integration mechanism.

Code writer will provide some unit test functions, maybe they could also do code coverage test.

Thanks
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)
发送时间: 2020年8月13日 16:03
收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io
主题: [edk2-devel] question about UnitTest Framework

Hi, Experts:
I have a question about UnitTest Framework.

UEFI Code has included some test infrastructure, such as:
PI-SCT / SCT / FWTS etc.

So, why we introduce a new UnitTest Framework?

Is it mainly for Code Coverage test?

Thanks


保密声明：
本邮件含有保密或专有信息，仅供指定收件人使用。严禁对本邮件或其内容做任何未经授权的查阅、使用、复制或转发。
CONFIDENTIAL NOTE:
This email contains confidential or legally privileged information and is for the sole use of its intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use, copying or forwarding of this email or the content of this email is strictly prohibited.





保密声明：
本邮件含有保密或专有信息，仅供指定收件人使用。严禁对本邮件或其内容做任何未经授权的查阅、使用、复制或转发。
CONFIDENTIAL NOTE:
This email contains confidential or legally privileged information and is for the sole use of its intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use, copying or forwarding of this email or the content of this email is strictly prohibited.