public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Eric" <eric.jin@intel.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: SCT bugzilla topic?
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:43:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA72DC7456565B47808A57108259571F63721C0C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210081354.grpti67t7iagzg77@bivouac.eciton.net>

Hi Leif,

We had better use "UEFI SCT" as the component. 
Other SCTs or test suites may be arranged in the EDK2-Test in future as the intention of EDK2-Test if my understanding is correct. Thanks.

Best Regards
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> 
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 4:14 PM
To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>; Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: SCT bugzilla topic?

Hi Mike,

I think we're agreed on an "EDK2 Test" product with an "SCT" component.
(Although that should probably be "UEFI SCT" for clarity.)

Regards,

Leif

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 03:02:57AM +0000, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> I can update BZ once there is a clear decision on what is required.
> 
> Mike
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jin, Eric
> > Sent: Sunday, December 9, 2018 6:19 PM
> > To: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>; Leif Lindholm 
> > <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; edk2- devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Dong Wei 
> > <Dong.Wei@arm.com>; Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: SCT bugzilla topic?
> > 
> > Supreeth and Leif,
> > 
> > UEFI-SCT is open source project now, the mantis is not proper 
> > option. We had better use the Bugzilla as edk2.
> > Could the stewards help to create the Edk2 Test Product and SCT 
> > component if most members want to split test with edk2?
> > 
> > Best Regards
> > Eric
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 3:37 AM
> > To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; edk2- 
> > devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D 
> > <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Dong Wei <Dong.Wei@arm.com>
> > Subject: RE: SCT bugzilla topic?
> > 
> > Leif,
> > 
> > Earlier, we used to use UTWG Mantis (for feature requests
> > - https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php).
> > After, UEFI-SCT became Open source, we did discuss to have the same 
> > infrastructure setup as edk2, which means using Bugzilla.
> > However, I don't think we have created a SCT component or
> > Edk2 Test Product yet.
> > 
> > Your email reminds me one more task after the SCT component / Edk2 
> > Test product is created i.e., to migrate over remaining UTWG issues 
> > to Bugzilla.
> > 
> > Once Eric chimes in/agrees, we will request Mike to create
> > Edk2 Test Product within Bugzilla.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Supreeth
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 8:47 AM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>; Supreeth Venkatesh 
> > <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>; Michael D Kinney 
> > <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Subject: SCT bugzilla topic?
> > 
> > Hi Eric, Supreeth, Mike,
> > 
> > I was looking to raise a feature request on UEFI SCT and didn't spot 
> > such a product. Should we create one?
> > 
> > Or perhaps we should have an EDK2 Test product with an SCT 
> > component?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Leif
> > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
> > confidential and may also be privileged.
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
> > immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, 
> > use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
> > medium. Thank you.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-03 14:46 SCT bugzilla topic? Leif Lindholm
2018-12-03 18:30 ` Richardson, Brian
2018-12-03 19:36 ` Supreeth Venkatesh
2018-12-10  2:18   ` Jin, Eric
2018-12-10  3:02     ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-12-10  8:13       ` Leif Lindholm
2018-12-10  8:43         ` Jin, Eric [this message]
2018-12-10 16:40           ` Supreeth Venkatesh
2018-12-10 17:37             ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-12-10 17:51               ` Supreeth Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DA72DC7456565B47808A57108259571F63721C0C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox