Hi Jeff,

 

For the test for non-standard or vendor specific protocols, in my initial idea, I would like to see them on a separate space and can be built with SCT infrastructure thru description files and build scripts provided by vendor.

Anyone can fetch the UEFI SCT or other specific test with his/her purpose/interest in this way easily. BTW, documents or spec link need be provided for user to understand test object and contribute test better.  

 

Anyway, it is a good start to record the request in Bugzilla Feature Request for further discussion.

 

Best Regards

Eric

 

From: Supreeth Venkatesh <Supreeth.Venkatesh@arm.com>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 1:25 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen (jbrasen@nvidia.com) <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2-test] Location of tests for vendor/edk2 specific protocols

 

+ Eric

Thanks Jeff for bringing this up.

As mentioned during our discussion on this topic briefly @ UEFI Plugfest 2019, I definitely like to see these non-standard protocol tests become part of test suite.

However, there has been no proposal yet, though there were proposals related to SBBR (Arm’s Server Base Boot Requirements).

 

Currently, any new platform tests added have to be added to UEFI SCT description files and build scripts for it to be included as part of test suite.

May I request you to create Bugzilla Feature Request @ https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/ under “edk-test” product and “UEFI-SCT” component, as well expand on how you like this to be implemented?

 

Supreeth

 

From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jeff Brasen via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 5:53 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test] Location of tests for vendor/edk2 specific protocols

 

 

Now that we have the edk2-test repo with the SCT infrastructure, has there been any thought for where tests that use this for non-standardized protocols should live? My initial thought is along with the protocols in edk2/edk2-platforms. For example if you had Silicon/NVIDIA/Include/Procotol/x.h you would have Silicon/NVIDIA/TestCase/x/ for this. Has there been any thoughts/plans on this?

 

Thanks,
Jeff

 


This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.