From: "Eric Jin" <eric.jin@intel.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
"Liu, XianhuiX" <xianhuix.liu@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test][Patch] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Add MediaPresentSupported check
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:36:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA72DC7456565B47808A57108259571F63819C91@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57813c28-f32e-e809-7006-e09d4f988555@gmx.de>
Thank you for the confirmation, Heinrich.
If no objection, I will commit it 36 hours later.
Reviewed-by: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 2:00 PM
To: Liu, XianhuiX <xianhuix.liu@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>; Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test][Patch] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Add MediaPresentSupported check
On 9/27/19 4:01 AM, Liu, XianhuiX wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
> Any concern about it? Thanks.
Your patch is correct. It is preceded by:
SctPrint (L"\nPlease disconnect the machine from the LAN, press any key within 10 seconds\n");
If MediaPresentSupported is false you cannot detect if the user removed the LAN cable or not.
Sorry for the noise.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
> Best Regards
> Xianhui Liu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
>> xianhui liu
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 10:18 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; xypron.glpk@gmx.de
>> Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>; Jin, Eric
>> <eric.jin@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test][Patch] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Add
>> MediaPresentSupported check
>>
>> Please refer to below comments.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf
>>> Of Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 3:06 AM
>>> To: Liu, XianhuiX <xianhuix.liu@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
>>> Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>; Jin, Eric
>>> <eric.jin@intel.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-test][Patch] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Add
>>> MediaPresentSupported check
>>>
>>> On 9/24/19 10:50 AM, xianhui liu wrote:
>>>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2061
>>>> check MediaPresent while MediaPresentSupported is TRUE sync change
>>>> from EFI to IHV SimpleNetworkBBTestFunction
>>>
>>> Thanks for addressing this issue.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
>>>
>>> %s/Cc:/Reported-by:/
>>>
>>>> Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>
>>>> Cc: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: xianhui liu <xianhuix.liu@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../BlackBoxTest/SimpleNetworkBBTestFunction.c | 64 +++++++++++-
>> --
>>> --------
>>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/uefi-
>>> sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleNetwork/BlackBoxTes
>>>> t/SimpleNetworkBBTestFunction.c
>>>> b/uefi-
>>> sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleNetwork/BlackBoxTes
>>>> t/SimpleNetworkBBTestFunction.c
>>>> index b4c7b5ee..8559e894 100644
>>>> ---
>>>> a/uefi-
>>> sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleNetwork/BlackBoxTes
>>>> t/SimpleNetworkBBTestFunction.c
>>>> +++ b/uefi-
>>> sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/SimpleNetwork/BlackBo
>>>> +++ xTest/SimpleNetworkBBTestFunction.c
>>>> @@ -1888,38 +1888,40 @@ BBTestGetStatusFunctionTest (
>>>> Status = SnpInterface->GetStatus (SnpInterface,
>>>> &InterruptStatus,
>>> &TxBuf);
>>>> Status1 = SnpInterface->GetStatus (SnpInterface,
>>>> &InterruptStatus, &TxBuf);
>>>>
>>>> - if (SnpInterface->Mode->MediaPresent == FALSE) {
>>>> - if ((Status1 == EFI_SUCCESS) && (Status == EFI_SUCCESS) &&
>>> (InterruptStatus == 0)) {
>>>> - AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>>>> - }
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - if ((Status1 == EFI_SUCCESS) && (Status == EFI_SUCCESS)) {
>>>> - AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>>>> - if (InterruptStatus &
>>>> - ~( EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_RECEIVE_INTERRUPT |
>>>> - EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_TRANSMIT_INTERRUPT |
>>>> - EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_COMMAND_INTERRUPT |
>>>> - EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_SOFTWARE_INTERRUPT)) {
>>>> - AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>>>> - }
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>>>> - }
>>>> + if (SnpInterface->Mode-> MediaPresentSupported == TRUE) {
>>>> + if (SnpInterface->Mode->MediaPresent == FALSE) {
>>>
>>>
>>> If MediaPresentSupported == FALSE shouldn't we assume that Media is
>>> present.
>>>
>>> So isn't a single 'if' enough:
>>>
>>> if (SnpInterface->Mode-> MediaPresentSupported == TRUE &&
>>> SnpInterface->Mode->MediaPresent == FALSE) {
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Heinrich Schuchardt
>>
>> Hi Heinrich,
>> We will skip the checkpoint if MediaPresentSupported == FALSE. Thanks.
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>> Please help correct me if any mistake here. Thanks.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Xianhui Liu
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> + if ((Status1 == EFI_SUCCESS) && (Status == EFI_SUCCESS) &&
>>> (InterruptStatus == 0)) {
>>>> + AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>>>> + }
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + if ((Status1 == EFI_SUCCESS) && (Status == EFI_SUCCESS)) {
>>>> + AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>>>> + if (InterruptStatus &
>>>> + ~( EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_RECEIVE_INTERRUPT |
>>>> + EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_TRANSMIT_INTERRUPT |
>>>> + EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_COMMAND_INTERRUPT |
>>>> + EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_SOFTWARE_INTERRUPT)) {
>>>> + AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>>>> + }
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
>>>> + StandardLib,
>>>> + AssertionType,
>>>> + gSimpleNetworkBBTestFunctionAssertionGuid022,
>>>> + L"EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_PROTOCOL.GetStatus -
>>>> + Invoke
>>> GetStatus() and verify interface correctness within test case",
>>>> + L"%a:%d:Status - %r, Status1 - %r, InterruptStatus - %d",
>>>> + __FILE__,
>>>> + (UINTN)__LINE__,
>>>> + Status,
>>>> + Status1,
>>>> + InterruptStatus
>>>> + );
>>>> }
>>>> - StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
>>>> - StandardLib,
>>>> - AssertionType,
>>>> - gSimpleNetworkBBTestFunctionAssertionGuid022,
>>>> - L"EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_PROTOCOL.GetStatus - Invoke
>>> GetStatus() and verify interface correctness within test case",
>>>> - L"%a:%d:Status - %r, Status1 - %r, InterruptStatus - %d",
>>>> - __FILE__,
>>>> - (UINTN)__LINE__,
>>>> - Status,
>>>> - Status1,
>>>> - InterruptStatus
>>>> - );
>>>>
>>>> //
>>>> // Restore SNP State
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 8:50 [edk2-test][Patch] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Add MediaPresentSupported check xianhui liu
2019-09-24 19:05 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-09-25 2:18 ` [edk2-devel] " xianhui liu
[not found] ` <15C78CE54FBDEE07.4626@groups.io>
2019-09-27 2:01 ` xianhui liu
2019-09-27 6:00 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-09-27 6:36 ` Eric Jin [this message]
[not found] ` <15C83824ED461154.3061@groups.io>
2019-09-29 3:37 ` Eric Jin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-23 1:42 xianhuix.liu
2019-09-24 3:33 ` [edk2-devel] " Eric Jin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DA72DC7456565B47808A57108259571F63819C91@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox