* [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
@ 2022-03-10 13:10 Pranav Madhu
2022-03-10 15:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 15:30 ` Sami Mujawar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pranav Madhu @ 2022-03-10 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel; +Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, Sami Mujawar
The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power control
module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in the
legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is added into
the power control module. To support warm reset, update
ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with parameters
for warm reboot.
Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
---
ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Link to github branch for this patch -
https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
index 655edc21b205..c9059dead6e9 100644
--- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
+++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
+#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64 0xc4000012
/* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */
#define ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0
diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
index 7bcd34849507..27e048ba0f7a 100644
--- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
+++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
@@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
switch (ResetType) {
+ case EfiResetWarm:
+ ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64;
+ ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
+ ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
+ break;
case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
// Map the platform specific reset as reboot
- case EfiResetWarm:
- // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
case EfiResetCold:
// Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
2022-03-10 13:10 [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly Pranav Madhu
@ 2022-03-10 15:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-11 6:40 ` Pranav Madhu
2022-03-10 15:30 ` Sami Mujawar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2022-03-10 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranav Madhu; +Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io, Ard Biesheuvel, Sami Mujawar
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 14:10, Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com> wrote:
>
> The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power control
> module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in the
> legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is added into
> the power control module. To support warm reset, update
> ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with parameters
> for warm reboot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
What happens on 32-bit platforms with this change?
What happens if the firmware does not implement
ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64?
> ---
> ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
> ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Link to github branch for this patch -
> https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> index 655edc21b205..c9059dead6e9 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
> +#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64 0xc4000012
>
> /* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */
> #define ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> index 7bcd34849507..27e048ba0f7a 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
> ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
>
> switch (ResetType) {
> + case EfiResetWarm:
> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64;
> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
> + break;
> case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
> // Map the platform specific reset as reboot
> - case EfiResetWarm:
> - // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
> case EfiResetCold:
> // Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
> ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
2022-03-10 13:10 [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly Pranav Madhu
2022-03-10 15:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2022-03-10 15:30 ` Sami Mujawar
2022-03-11 6:06 ` Pranav Madhu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sami Mujawar @ 2022-03-10 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranav Madhu, devel; +Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, nd
Hi Pranav,
Thank you for this patch.
Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 10/03/2022 01:10 PM, Pranav Madhu wrote:
> The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power control
> module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in the
> legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is added into
> the power control module. To support warm reset, update
> ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with parameters
> for warm reboot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
> ---
> ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
> ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Link to github branch for this patch -
> https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> index 655edc21b205..c9059dead6e9 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
> +#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64 0xc4000012
>
> /* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */
> #define ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> index 7bcd34849507..27e048ba0f7a 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
> ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
>
> switch (ResetType) {
> + case EfiResetWarm:
> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64;
> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
> + break;
[SAMI] SYSTEM_RESET2 is an optional feature and if not supported would
return NOT_SUPPORTED. So, if a platform does not support SYSTEM_RESET2,
should the code here fall back to SYSTEM_RESET?
According to the PSCI specification, it is the responsibility of the OS
to check that SYSTEM_RESET2 is supported before calling SYSTEM_RESET2 (I
believe this is applicable for the case where UEFI is not used to boot
the OS). However, if the runtime service ResetSystem() is invoked by the
OS requesting a warm reset, is it not the firmware's responsibility to
ensure that SYSTEM_RESET2 is supported? Any thoughts?
[/SAMI]
> case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
> // Map the platform specific reset as reboot
> - case EfiResetWarm:
> - // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
> case EfiResetCold:
> // Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
> ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
2022-03-10 15:30 ` Sami Mujawar
@ 2022-03-11 6:06 ` Pranav Madhu
2022-03-11 14:28 ` Sami Mujawar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pranav Madhu @ 2022-03-11 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sami Mujawar, devel@edk2.groups.io; +Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, nd
Hi Sami,
Thanks for your comments. Please find my reply inline.
Regards,
Pranav
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 9:01 PM
> To: Pranav Madhu <Pranav.Madhu@arm.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request
> correctly
>
> Hi Pranav,
>
> Thank you for this patch.
>
> Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
>
> Regards,
>
> Sami Mujawar
>
>
> On 10/03/2022 01:10 PM, Pranav Madhu wrote:
> > The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power
> > control module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in
> > the legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is
> > added into the power control module. To support warm reset, update
> > ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with
> > parameters for warm reboot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
> > ---
> > ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
> > ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7
> +++++--
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Link to github branch for this patch -
> > https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
> >
> > diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > index 655edc21b205..c9059dead6e9 100644
> > --- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > +++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
> > #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
> > #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
> > #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
> > +#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64 0xc4000012
> >
> > /* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */
> > #define ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0 diff --git
> > a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > index 7bcd34849507..27e048ba0f7a 100644
> > --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
> > ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
> >
> > switch (ResetType) {
> > + case EfiResetWarm:
> > + ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64;
> > + ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
> > + ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
> > + break;
> [SAMI] SYSTEM_RESET2 is an optional feature and if not supported would
> return NOT_SUPPORTED. So, if a platform does not support SYSTEM_RESET2,
> should the code here fall back to SYSTEM_RESET?
> According to the PSCI specification, it is the responsibility of the OS to check
> that SYSTEM_RESET2 is supported before calling SYSTEM_RESET2 (I believe this
> is applicable for the case where UEFI is not used to boot the OS). However, if
> the runtime service ResetSystem() is invoked by the OS requesting a warm
> reset, is it not the firmware's responsibility to ensure that SYSTEM_RESET2 is
> supported? Any thoughts?
Right, from PSCI specification, what I understood is before invoking SYSTEM_RESET2, the OS should query the PSCI capabilities using PSCI_FEATURES for SYSTEM_RESET2. The OS should invoke RESET2 only if PSCI_FEATURES returns 0. From spec, what I understood is it is not the responsibility of firmware. If OS issue RESET2 without querying FEATURES, the only option for firmware is to return NOT_SUPPORTED.
> [/SAMI]
> > case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
> > // Map the platform specific reset as reboot
> > - case EfiResetWarm:
> > - // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
> > case EfiResetCold:
> > // Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
> > ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
2022-03-10 15:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2022-03-11 6:40 ` Pranav Madhu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pranav Madhu @ 2022-03-11 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ard Biesheuvel; +Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io, Ard Biesheuvel, Sami Mujawar, nd
Hi Ard,
Thanks for your suggestions. Please find my reply inline.
Regards,
Pranav
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 8:56 PM
> To: Pranav Madhu <Pranav.Madhu@arm.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request
> correctly
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 14:10, Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power
> > control module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in
> > the legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is
> > added into the power control module. To support warm reset, update
> > ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with
> > parameters for warm reboot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
>
> What happens on 32-bit platforms with this change?
Will change this to PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH32, as this is compatible with AARCH64 as well.
>
> What happens if the firmware does not implement
> ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64?
As per PSCI 1.1 specification, what I understood is before invoking SYSTEM_RESET2, the OS should query the PSCI capabilities using PSCI_FEATURES for SYSTEM_RESET2 support. The OS should invoke RESET2 only if PSCI_FEATURES returns 0. If the OS is invoking this call without querying the features, PSCI will return UNSUPPORTED.
>
> > ---
> > ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
> > ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7
> > +++++--
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Link to github branch for this patch -
> > https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
> >
> > diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > index 655edc21b205..c9059dead6e9 100644
> > --- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > +++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
> > @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
> > #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
> > #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
> > #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
> > +#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64 0xc4000012
> >
> > /* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */ #define
> > ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0 diff --git
> > a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > index 7bcd34849507..27e048ba0f7a 100644
> > --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
> > @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
> > ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
> >
> > switch (ResetType) {
> > + case EfiResetWarm:
> > + ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64;
> > + ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
> > + ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
> > + break;
> > case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
> > // Map the platform specific reset as reboot
> > - case EfiResetWarm:
> > - // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
> > case EfiResetCold:
> > // Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
> > ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
@ 2022-03-11 6:52 Pranav Madhu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pranav Madhu @ 2022-03-11 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel; +Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, Sami Mujawar
The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power control
module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in the
legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is added into
the power control module. To support warm reset, update
ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with parameters
for warm reboot.
Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
---
ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Changes since V1:
- Addressed comments from Ard
Link to github branch for this patch -
https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
index 655edc21b205..90123efcbd56 100644
--- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
+++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
+#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH32 0x84000012
/* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */
#define ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0
diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
index 7bcd34849507..211941c57938 100644
--- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
+++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
@@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
switch (ResetType) {
+ case EfiResetWarm:
+ ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH32;
+ ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
+ ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
+ break;
case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
// Map the platform specific reset as reboot
- case EfiResetWarm:
- // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
case EfiResetCold:
// Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly
2022-03-11 6:06 ` Pranav Madhu
@ 2022-03-11 14:28 ` Sami Mujawar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sami Mujawar @ 2022-03-11 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranav Madhu, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, nd, Thomas Abraham, Leif Lindholm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6651 bytes --]
Hi Pranav,
Please see my response inline marked [SAMI].
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 11/03/2022 06:06 AM, Pranav Madhu wrote:
> Hi Sami,
>
> Thanks for your comments. Please find my reply inline.
>
> Regards,
> Pranav
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 9:01 PM
>> To: Pranav Madhu <Pranav.Madhu@arm.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>; nd <nd@arm.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request
>> correctly
>>
>> Hi Pranav,
>>
>> Thank you for this patch.
>>
>> Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sami Mujawar
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2022 01:10 PM, Pranav Madhu wrote:
>>> The warm reboot requests are mapped to cold reboot as the power
>>> control module was not capable of handling the warm reboot requests in
>>> the legacy implementation. The support for warm reboot support is
>>> added into the power control module. To support warm reset, update
>>> ArmPsciResetSystemLib, and there by invoke the PSCI call with
>>> parameters for warm reboot.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pranav Madhu <pranav.madhu@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h | 1 +
>>> ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c | 7
>> +++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Link to github branch for this patch -
>>> https://github.com/Pranav-Madhu/edk2/tree/topics/warm_reboot
>>>
>>> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
>>> b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
>>> index 655edc21b205..c9059dead6e9 100644
>>> --- a/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
>>> +++ b/ArmPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/ArmStdSmc.h
>>> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
>>> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_MIGRATE_AARCH32 0x84000005
>>> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF 0x84000008
>>> #define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET 0x84000009
>>> +#define ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64 0xc4000012
>>>
>>> /* The current PSCI version is: 0.2 */
>>> #define ARM_SMC_PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR 0 diff --git
>>> a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
>>> b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
>>> index 7bcd34849507..27e048ba0f7a 100644
>>> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
>>> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmPsciResetSystemLib/ArmPsciResetSystemLib.c
>>> @@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ LibResetSystem (
>>> ARM_SMC_ARGS ArmSmcArgs;
>>>
>>> switch (ResetType) {
>>> + case EfiResetWarm:
>>> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64;
>>> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg1 = 0;
>>> + ArmSmcArgs.Arg2 = 0;
>>> + break;
>> [SAMI] SYSTEM_RESET2 is an optional feature and if not supported would
>> return NOT_SUPPORTED. So, if a platform does not support SYSTEM_RESET2,
>> should the code here fall back to SYSTEM_RESET?
>> According to the PSCI specification, it is the responsibility of the OS to check
>> that SYSTEM_RESET2 is supported before calling SYSTEM_RESET2 (I believe this
>> is applicable for the case where UEFI is not used to boot the OS). However, if
>> the runtime service ResetSystem() is invoked by the OS requesting a warm
>> reset, is it not the firmware's responsibility to ensure that SYSTEM_RESET2 is
>> supported? Any thoughts?
> Right, from PSCI specification, what I understood is before invoking SYSTEM_RESET2, the OS should query the PSCI capabilities using PSCI_FEATURES for SYSTEM_RESET2. The OS should invoke RESET2 only if PSCI_FEATURES returns 0. From spec, what I understood is it is not the responsibility of firmware. If OS issue RESET2 without querying FEATURES, the only option for firmware is to return NOT_SUPPORTED.
[SAMI] There are 2 scenarios:
1. A boot loader other than UEFI is used to boot the OS.
In this case the OS shall directly call the PSCI interface to reboot.
For this scenario the Linux kernel code performs the required checks and
makes the appropriate PSCI call see
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.16.13/source/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c#L299
2. UEFI is used to boot the OS.
In this case the UEFI Runtime Services ResetSystem() will be invoked by
the OS to initiate a reboot.
In this scenario the checks performed by the OS to see if SYSTEM_RESET2
is supported are irrelevant. It is the firmware that needs to perform
the check. Although
the PSCI specification section '5.12.4 Caller responsibilities' mentions
'The calling OS...'; this is an example, and in context with the current
usage scenario, it is the
responsibility of the firmware (the Caller) to perform these checks.
Otherwise this can result in failures on platforms that do not implement
the SYSTEM_RESET2 feature.
The relevant code in the Linux kernel for this scenario can be seen at:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.16.13/source/drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c#L13
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.16.13/source/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c#L412
I also noticed that there are 2 versions of the ResetSystem library:
[A] EfiResetSystemLib based implementation
This is
ArmPkg\Library\ArmPsciResetSystemLib\ArmPsciResetSystemLib.inf which
links with EmbeddedPkg/ResetRuntimeDxe/ResetRuntimeDxe.inf
[B] ResetSystemLib based implementation
This is
ArmPkg\Library\ArmSmcPsciResetSystemLib\ArmSmcPsciResetSystemLib.inf
which links with
MdeModulePkg/Universal/ResetSystemRuntimeDxe/ResetSystemRuntimeDxe.inf
I can see that [A] EfiResetSystemLib is only used by:
- Platform/ARM/SgiPkg/SgiPlatform.dsc.inc
- Silicon/Ampere/AmpereAltraPkg/AmpereAltraPkg.dsc.inc
- Silicon/Phytium/PhytiumCommonPkg/PhytiumCommonPkg.dsc.inc
Moreover, the commit b2c55e732888fd721f5235a820b1d1c45209992d states
that the ArmSmcPsciResetSystemLib.inf ([B] ResetSystemLib) was introduced
with the intention to replace the EfiResetSystemLib based implementation
that is deprecated now that we have decided that there is
no longer a reason to keep a different ResetSystem() implementation
under EmbeddedPkg.
Considering this, I don't think this patch should modify
ArmPkg\Library\ArmPsciResetSystemLib.
SgiPkg (and if possible other platforms) should consider moving to
ResetSystemLib based implementation.
[/SAMI]
>> [/SAMI]
>>> case EfiResetPlatformSpecific:
>>> // Map the platform specific reset as reboot
>>> - case EfiResetWarm:
>>> - // Map a warm reset into a cold reset
>>> case EfiResetCold:
>>> // Send a PSCI 0.2 SYSTEM_RESET command
>>> ArmSmcArgs.Arg0 = ARM_SMC_ID_PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10373 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-11 14:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-10 13:10 [edk2][PATCH V1 1/1] ArmPkg: Handle warm reboot request correctly Pranav Madhu
2022-03-10 15:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-11 6:40 ` Pranav Madhu
2022-03-10 15:30 ` Sami Mujawar
2022-03-11 6:06 ` Pranav Madhu
2022-03-11 14:28 ` Sami Mujawar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-11 6:52 Pranav Madhu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox