From: "Guomin Jiang" <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Rebuild the description table after Reset Device
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 13:04:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB2955B789C8796F53CA1FE2EC9DAE0@DM6PR11MB2955.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B80AF82E9BFB8E4FBD8C89DA810C6A093C9F81EE@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Add comment inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 4:04 PM
> To: Jiang, Guomin <guomin.jiang@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Rebuild the
> description table after Reset Device
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jiang, Guomin
> > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 2:44 PM
> > To: Wu, Hao A; devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Wang, Jian J; Ni, Ray
> > Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Rebuild
> the
> > description table after Reset Device
> >
> > Hi Hao,
> >
> > Add comments inline.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:12 PM
> > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Jiang,
> > Guomin
> > > <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Rebuild
> > > the description table after Reset Device
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > > Wu, Hao A
> > > > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:10 PM
> > > > To: Jiang, Guomin; devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > Cc: Wang, Jian J; Ni, Ray
> > > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe:
> Rebuild
> > > the
> > > > description table after Reset Device
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jiang, Guomin
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2020 9:36 AM
> > > > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > > > Cc: Wang, Jian J; Wu, Hao A; Ni, Ray
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Rebuild the
> description
> > > > > table after Reset Device
> > > > >
> > > > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2694
> > > > >
> > > > > When the USB fail and then Reset Device, it should rebuild description.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbBus.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbBus.c
> > > > > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbBus.c
> > > > > index 4b4915c019..9f2d2cc87f 100644
> > > > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbBus.c
> > > > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbBus.c
> > > > > @@ -869,6 +869,11 @@ UsbIoPortReset (
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > DEBUG (( EFI_D_INFO, "UsbIoPortReset: device is now ADDRESSED
> > > > > at %d\n", Dev->Address));
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > + //
> > > > >
> > > > > + // The description will be invalid after reset, should rebuild it as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > + //
> > > > >
> > > > > + UsbBuildDescTable (Dev);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Guomin,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the proposed patch.
> > > >
> > > > Could you help to explain in more detail for the above fix with
> > > > regard to the transfer ring not being set properly in the XHCI driver?
> Thanks.
> >
> > When I debug, I dump the below data structure and found that before
> > UsbMassReset, the corresponding slot transfer ring is normal and
> > invalid after UsbMassReset.
> > USB_DEV_CONTEXT = 0x148
> > +0x0 Enabled
> > +0x1 SlotId
> > +0x4 RouteString
> > +0x8 ParentRouteString
> > +0xC XhciDevAddr
> > +0xD BusDevAddr
> > +0x10 InputContext
> > +0x18 OutputContext
> > +0x20 EndpointTransferRing[31]
> > +0x118 DevDesc
> > +0x130 ConfDesc
> > +0x138 ActiveConfiguration
> > +0x140 ActiveAlternateSetting
> >
> > Before UsbMassReset
> > 000002D0: -01 01 00 00 00 00 10 10
> > 000002E0: 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00-80 02 FA 06 00 00 00 00
> > 000002F0: C0 16 FA 06 00 00 00 00-98 27 FC 06 00 00 00 00
> > 00000300: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-98 26 FC 06 00 00 00 00
> > 00000310: 98 BE F9 06 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000320: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000330: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000340: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000350: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000360: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000370: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000380: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000390: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003A0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003B0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003C0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003D0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003E0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003F0: 12 01 00 03 00 00 00 09-F4 46 01 00 00 00 01 02
> > 00000400: 03 01 00 00 00 00 00 00-98 CD F9 06 00 00 00 00
> > 00000410: 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-18 24 FC 06 00 00 00 00
> >
> > After UsbMassReset
> > 000002D0: -01 01 00 00 00 00 10 10
> > 000002E0: 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00-80 02 FA 06 00 00 00 00
> > 000002F0: C0 16 FA 06 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000300: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000310: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000320: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000330: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000340: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000350: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000360: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000370: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000380: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000390: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003A0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003B0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003C0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003D0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003E0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 000003F0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000400: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00000410: 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >
> > After Reset Finished, it will try to get data again by sending command
> > to Usb Mass Device and it will use USB_DEV_CONTEXT.
> EndpointTransferRing[4].
> > But it haven't been initialized after reset, and ASSERT will trigger
> > when access the USB_DEV_CONTEXT. EndpointTransferRing and will show
> > ASSERT
> >
> c:\users\guominji\dcg10nm\edk2\MdeModulePkg\Bus\Pci\XhciDxe\XhciSch
> e
> > d.c(1909): TrsRing != ((void *) 0)
> >
> > The EndpointTranferRing should be initialized by UsbBuildDescTable()
> > but seem that it is omitted in Reset branch, so I add it.
>
>
> Sorry Guomin, I still do not fully understand the link between calling the
> UsbBuildDescTable() in UsbBusDxe and the re-initialization of the
> 'EndpointTranferRing' in the XhciDxe. Could you help to provide more detail?
I am sorry that make confusion to you, I will explain it in detail now.
1. The critical call flow as below
UsbMassReset()
--> UsbMass->Transport->Reset() == UsbBotResetDevice()
--> UsbBot->UsbIo->UsbPortReset() == UsbIoPortReset()
--> UsbIf->Device->ParentIf->HubApi->ResetPort() == UsbRootHubResetPort()
--> UsbHcGetRootHubPortStatus()
--> UsbBus->Usb2Hc-GetRootHubPortStatus() == XhcGetRootHubPortStatus()
--> XhcPollPortStatusChange()
--> XhcDisableSlotCmd() or XhcDisableSlotCmd64() [Very very critical routine 1]
--> XhcInitializeDeviceSlot() or XhcInitializeDeviceSlot64() [Very very critical routine 2]
--> UsbSetAddress()
--> UsbSetConfig()
--> UsbBus->Usb2Hc->ControlTransfer() == XhcControlTransfer()
--> XhcSetConfigCmd() or XhcSetConfigCmd64() [Very very critical routine 3]
There are three very very critical routine,
1. XhcDisableSlotCmd() or XhcDisableSlotCmd64() will disable the slot context and free the allocated memory.
2. XhcInitializeDeviceSlot() or XhcInitializeDeviceSlot() will initialize the basic control and slot endpoint transfer ring.
3. XhcSetConfigCmd() or XhcSetConfigCmd64() will configure the other transfer ring. It depend on Xhc->UsbDevContext[Slot].DevDesc.NumConfigurations, unfortunately, the DevDesc haven't benn initialized by UsbBuildDescTable and it is 0. So XhcSetConfigCmd() or XhcSetConfigCmd64() haven't run.
After run below 3 critical routine, the device is initialize but EndpointTransferRing of Input and Output haven't been initialized and still keep NULL.
When UsbMassReadBlocks, it will use uninitialized EndpointTransferRing and will ASSERT.
> Another thing I found (if current proposed fix is a proper solution) is that in
> UsbBuildDescTable() , several memory allocations will be made to store the
> device descriptor/config descriptor. Could you help to double check if their
> old values are properly freed in order to avoid memory leak?
>
I will investigate it and give you feedback.
> Best Regards,
> Hao Wu
>
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > Also, judging from the function description comments in
> > > UsbBuildDescTable():
> > > > |> /**
> > > > |> Build the whole array of descriptors. This function must
> > > > |> be called after UsbGetMaxPacketSize0 returns the max packet
> > > > |> size correctly for endpoint 0.
> > > > |> ...
> > > > |> **/
> > > > |> EFI_STATUS
> > > > |> UsbBuildDescTable (
> > > > |> IN USB_DEVICE *UsbDev
> > > > |> )
> > > >
> > > > Does function UsbGetMaxPacketSize0() need to be called before
> > > > UsbBuildDescTable() in the proposed fix?
> >
> > I ignored it and will double check it.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > One more thing, could you help to add the information for what tests
> > > have been done for the proposed patch as well?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> >
> > Have test OVMF and test pass, detail as below I use qemu-w64-2020020,
> > you should install it first and add it to PATH environment, the
> > procedure as below 1. Import the test patch from
> > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/attachment.cgi?id=508
> > 2. type ```build -p OvmfPkg\OvmfPkgX64.dsc -b DEBUG -a X64``` to
> > generate OVMF.fd 3. type ```qemu-img create file.img 1G``` to create
> > test image.
> > 4. type ```qemu-system-x86_64 -bios OVMF.fd -drive
> > if=none,id=stick,file=file.img -device nec-usb-xhci,id=xhci, -device
> > usb- storage,bus=xhci.0,drive=stick -global isa-debugcon.iobase=0x402
> > - debugcon file:xhci.log``` 5. you will see hang currently and will
> > see ASSERT when check xhci.log.
> > 6. import proposal patch, the symptom disappear.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Hao Wu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > //
> > > > >
> > > > > // Reset the current active configure, after this device
> > > > >
> > > > > // is in CONFIGURED state.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1.windows.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-26 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-25 1:36 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/UsbBusDxe: Rebuild the description table after Reset Device Guomin Jiang
2020-04-26 5:09 ` Wu, Hao A
2020-04-26 5:12 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2020-04-26 6:43 ` Guomin Jiang
2020-04-26 8:03 ` Wu, Hao A
2020-04-26 13:04 ` Guomin Jiang [this message]
2020-04-27 1:36 ` Wu, Hao A
2020-04-28 1:03 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-04-28 1:14 ` Guomin Jiang
2020-04-28 2:31 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-04-28 3:22 ` Guomin Jiang
[not found] ` <1609DDC63BB4AEBF.19313@groups.io>
2020-04-30 9:47 ` Guomin Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB2955B789C8796F53CA1FE2EC9DAE0@DM6PR11MB2955.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox