From: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
To: "Ma, Maurice" <maurice.ma@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Ma, Maurice" <maurice.ma@intel.com>,
"Chiu, Chasel" <chasel.chiu@intel.com>,
"Desimone, Nathaniel L" <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IntelFsp2Pkg: Fix FSP binary rebasing issue for PE32+ image
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 04:12:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4058EEA4F2BB4641208C1ADDE3E70@DM6PR11MB4058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6799c7ce4aff0db1d5d0c6afe2901fb10bc939a9.1605139779.git.maurice.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 8:11 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] IntelFsp2Pkg: Fix FSP binary rebasing issue for PE32+ image
Current FSP rebasing script SplitFspBin.py has support for both
PE32 and PE32+ image formats. However, while updating the ImageBase field in the image header, it always assumed the ImageBase field is 32bit long. Since PE32+ image format defined ImageBase as 64bit, the current script will only update the lower 32bit value and leave the upper 32bit untouched. It does not work well for PE32+ image that requires update in the upper 32bit ImageBase field. The expected behavior is to update the full 64bit field. This patch implemented this fix.
Signed-off-by: Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
---
IntelFsp2Pkg/Tools/SplitFspBin.py | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Tools/SplitFspBin.py b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Tools/SplitFspBin.py
index 3c0d5af1b6..24272e82af 100644
--- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Tools/SplitFspBin.py
+++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Tools/SplitFspBin.py
@@ -677,8 +677,12 @@ class PeTeImage:
else:
offset = self.Offset + self.DosHdr.e_lfanew
offset += EFI_IMAGE_NT_HEADERS32.OptionalHeader.offset
- offset += EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32.ImageBase.offset
- size = EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32.ImageBase.size
+ if self.PeHdr.OptionalHeader.PePlusOptHdr.Magic == 0x20b: #
+ PE32+ image
+ offset +=
+ EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32_PLUS.ImageBase.offset
+ size = EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32_PLUS.ImageBase.size
+ else:
+ offset += EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32.ImageBase.offset
+ size = EFI_IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER32.ImageBase.size
value = Bytes2Val(fdbin[offset:offset+size]) + delta
fdbin[offset:offset+size] = Val2Bytes(value, size)
--
2.29.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 0:10 [PATCH] IntelFsp2Pkg: Fix FSP binary rebasing issue for PE32+ image Ma, Maurice
2020-11-12 0:37 ` Chiu, Chasel
2020-11-12 4:12 ` Zeng, Star [this message]
2020-11-14 23:52 ` Nate DeSimone
2020-11-15 0:18 ` Nate DeSimone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB4058EEA4F2BB4641208C1ADDE3E70@DM6PR11MB4058.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox