From: "Jeshua Smith via groups.io" <jeshuas=nvidia.com@groups.io>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "ardb+tianocore@kernel.org" <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
"quic_llindhol@quicinc.com" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
"pierre.gondois@arm.com" <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT: Require Package node in hierarchy
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:11:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB3371D7355BA0BE72B1273CABDB2B2@DM6PR12MB3371.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6666e0a5b84cef6d13a6c082e9fdf052c8618a62.1707152171.git.jeshuas@nvidia.com>
Can we get this reviewed/merged?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeshua Smith <jeshuas@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 12:01 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: ardb+tianocore@kernel.org; quic_llindhol@quicinc.com;
> pierre.gondois@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; Jeshua Smith
> <jeshuas@nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT: Require Package node in
> hierarchy
>
> The code was incorrectly assuming that root nodes had to be physical package
> nodes and vice versa. This is not always true, so update the check to simply
> require exactly one package node somewhere in the hierarchy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeshua Smith <jeshuas@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
> ---
> Note: This is a complete replacement for [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT:
> Remove incorrect root node check
>
> Version 2: added documentation for the PackageNodeSeen parameter
>
> .../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c | 32 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpu
> TopologyGenerator.c
> b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpu
> TopologyGenerator.c
> index 9e3efb49e6..40ed10eae6 100644
> ---
> a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpu
> TopologyGenerator.c
> +++
> b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCp
> +++ uTopologyGenerator.c
> @@ -1072,6 +1072,7 @@ CreateAmlProcessorContainer (
> @param [in] IsLeaf The ProcNode is a leaf.
> @param [in] NodeToken NodeToken of the ProcNode.
> @param [in] ParentNodeToken Parent NodeToken of the ProcNode.
> + @param [in] PackageNodeSeen A parent of the ProcNode has the physical
> package flag set.
>
> @retval EFI_SUCCESS Success.
> @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER Invalid parameter.
> @@ -1083,23 +1084,24 @@ CheckProcNode (
> UINT32 NodeFlags,
> BOOLEAN IsLeaf,
> CM_OBJECT_TOKEN NodeToken,
> - CM_OBJECT_TOKEN ParentNodeToken
> + CM_OBJECT_TOKEN ParentNodeToken,
> + BOOLEAN PackageNodeSeen
> )
> {
> BOOLEAN InvalidFlags;
> BOOLEAN HasPhysicalPackageBit;
> - BOOLEAN IsTopLevelNode;
>
> HasPhysicalPackageBit = (NodeFlags &
> EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL) ==
> EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL;
> - IsTopLevelNode = (ParentNodeToken == CM_NULL_TOKEN);
>
> - // A top-level node is a Physical Package and conversely.
> - InvalidFlags = HasPhysicalPackageBit ^ IsTopLevelNode;
> + // Only one Physical Package flag is allowed in the hierarchy
> + InvalidFlags = HasPhysicalPackageBit && PackageNodeSeen;
>
> // Check Leaf specific flags.
> if (IsLeaf) {
> InvalidFlags |= ((NodeFlags & PPTT_LEAF_MASK) != PPTT_LEAF_MASK);
> + // Must have Physical Package flag somewhere in the hierarchy
> + InvalidFlags |= !(HasPhysicalPackageBit || PackageNodeSeen);
> } else {
> InvalidFlags |= ((NodeFlags & PPTT_LEAF_MASK) != 0);
> }
> @@ -1130,6 +1132,7 @@ CheckProcNode (
> node to.
> @param [in,out] ProcContainerIndex Pointer to the current processor
> container
> index to be used as UID.
> + @param [in] PackageNodeSeen A parent of the ProcNode has the
> physical package flag set.
>
> @retval EFI_SUCCESS Success.
> @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER Invalid parameter.
> @@ -1143,7 +1146,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> IN CONST EDKII_CONFIGURATION_MANAGER_PROTOCOL *CONST
> CfgMgrProtocol,
> IN CM_OBJECT_TOKEN NodeToken,
> IN AML_NODE_HANDLE ParentNode,
> - IN OUT UINT32 *ProcContainerIndex
> + IN OUT UINT32 *ProcContainerIndex,
> + IN BOOLEAN PackageNodeSeen
> )
> {
> EFI_STATUS Status;
> @@ -1153,6 +1157,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> AML_OBJECT_NODE_HANDLE ProcContainerNode;
> UINT32 Uid;
> UINT16 Name;
> + BOOLEAN HasPhysicalPackageBit;
>
> ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
> ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeList != NULL); @@ -1175,7 +1180,8 @@
> CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags,
> TRUE,
> Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> - NodeToken
> + NodeToken,
> + PackageNodeSeen
> );
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> ASSERT (0);
> @@ -1208,7 +1214,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags,
> FALSE,
> Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> - NodeToken
> + NodeToken,
> + PackageNodeSeen
> );
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> ASSERT (0);
> @@ -1249,13 +1256,17 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> ProcContainerName++;
> }
>
> + HasPhysicalPackageBit = (Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags &
> EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL) ==
> + EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL;
> +
> // Recursively continue creating an AML tree.
> Status = CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> Generator,
> CfgMgrProtocol,
> Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> ProcContainerNode,
> - ProcContainerIndex
> + ProcContainerIndex,
> + (PackageNodeSeen || HasPhysicalPackageBit)
> );
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> ASSERT (0);
> @@ -1311,7 +1322,8 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
> CfgMgrProtocol,
> CM_NULL_TOKEN,
> ScopeNode,
> - &ProcContainerIndex
> + &ProcContainerIndex,
> + FALSE
> );
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> ASSERT (0);
> --
> 2.34.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#116689): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/116689
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104183075/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 19:00 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT: Require Package node in hierarchy Jeshua Smith via groups.io
2024-03-12 16:11 ` Jeshua Smith via groups.io [this message]
2024-03-12 16:14 ` Sami Mujawar
2024-03-13 14:23 ` Sami Mujawar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR12MB3371D7355BA0BE72B1273CABDB2B2@DM6PR12MB3371.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox