public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeshua Smith via groups.io" <jeshuas=nvidia.com@groups.io>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "ardb+tianocore@kernel.org" <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	"quic_llindhol@quicinc.com" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
	"pierre.gondois@arm.com" <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT: Require Package node in hierarchy
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:11:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB3371D7355BA0BE72B1273CABDB2B2@DM6PR12MB3371.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6666e0a5b84cef6d13a6c082e9fdf052c8618a62.1707152171.git.jeshuas@nvidia.com>

Can we get this reviewed/merged?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeshua Smith <jeshuas@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 12:01 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: ardb+tianocore@kernel.org; quic_llindhol@quicinc.com;
> pierre.gondois@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; Jeshua Smith
> <jeshuas@nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT: Require Package node in
> hierarchy
> 
> The code was incorrectly assuming that root nodes had to be physical package
> nodes and vice versa. This is not always true, so update the check to simply
> require exactly one package node somewhere in the hierarchy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeshua Smith <jeshuas@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
> ---
> Note: This is a complete replacement for [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT:
> Remove incorrect root node check
> 
> Version 2: added documentation for the PackageNodeSeen parameter
> 
>  .../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c                | 32 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git
> a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpu
> TopologyGenerator.c
> b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpu
> TopologyGenerator.c
> index 9e3efb49e6..40ed10eae6 100644
> ---
> a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpu
> TopologyGenerator.c
> +++
> b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCp
> +++ uTopologyGenerator.c
> @@ -1072,6 +1072,7 @@ CreateAmlProcessorContainer (
>    @param [in]  IsLeaf           The ProcNode is a leaf.
>    @param [in]  NodeToken        NodeToken of the ProcNode.
>    @param [in]  ParentNodeToken  Parent NodeToken of the ProcNode.
> +  @param [in]  PackageNodeSeen  A parent of the ProcNode has the physical
> package flag set.
> 
>    @retval EFI_SUCCESS             Success.
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   Invalid parameter.
> @@ -1083,23 +1084,24 @@ CheckProcNode (
>    UINT32           NodeFlags,
>    BOOLEAN          IsLeaf,
>    CM_OBJECT_TOKEN  NodeToken,
> -  CM_OBJECT_TOKEN  ParentNodeToken
> +  CM_OBJECT_TOKEN  ParentNodeToken,
> +  BOOLEAN          PackageNodeSeen
>    )
>  {
>    BOOLEAN  InvalidFlags;
>    BOOLEAN  HasPhysicalPackageBit;
> -  BOOLEAN  IsTopLevelNode;
> 
>    HasPhysicalPackageBit = (NodeFlags &
> EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL) ==
>                            EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL;
> -  IsTopLevelNode = (ParentNodeToken == CM_NULL_TOKEN);
> 
> -  // A top-level node is a Physical Package and conversely.
> -  InvalidFlags = HasPhysicalPackageBit ^ IsTopLevelNode;
> +  // Only one Physical Package flag is allowed in the hierarchy
> + InvalidFlags = HasPhysicalPackageBit && PackageNodeSeen;
> 
>    // Check Leaf specific flags.
>    if (IsLeaf) {
>      InvalidFlags |= ((NodeFlags & PPTT_LEAF_MASK) != PPTT_LEAF_MASK);
> +    // Must have Physical Package flag somewhere in the hierarchy
> +    InvalidFlags |= !(HasPhysicalPackageBit || PackageNodeSeen);
>    } else {
>      InvalidFlags |= ((NodeFlags & PPTT_LEAF_MASK) != 0);
>    }
> @@ -1130,6 +1132,7 @@ CheckProcNode (
>                                        node to.
>    @param [in,out] ProcContainerIndex  Pointer to the current processor
> container
>                                        index to be used as UID.
> +  @param [in]  PackageNodeSeen        A parent of the ProcNode has the
> physical package flag set.
> 
>    @retval EFI_SUCCESS             Success.
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   Invalid parameter.
> @@ -1143,7 +1146,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>    IN  CONST EDKII_CONFIGURATION_MANAGER_PROTOCOL  *CONST
> CfgMgrProtocol,
>    IN        CM_OBJECT_TOKEN                               NodeToken,
>    IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode,
> -  IN OUT    UINT32                                        *ProcContainerIndex
> +  IN OUT    UINT32                                        *ProcContainerIndex,
> +  IN        BOOLEAN                                       PackageNodeSeen
>    )
>  {
>    EFI_STATUS              Status;
> @@ -1153,6 +1157,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>    AML_OBJECT_NODE_HANDLE  ProcContainerNode;
>    UINT32                  Uid;
>    UINT16                  Name;
> +  BOOLEAN                 HasPhysicalPackageBit;
> 
>    ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
>    ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeList != NULL); @@ -1175,7 +1180,8 @@
> CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags,
>                     TRUE,
>                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> -                   NodeToken
> +                   NodeToken,
> +                   PackageNodeSeen
>                     );
>          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>            ASSERT (0);
> @@ -1208,7 +1214,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags,
>                     FALSE,
>                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> -                   NodeToken
> +                   NodeToken,
> +                   PackageNodeSeen
>                     );
>          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>            ASSERT (0);
> @@ -1249,13 +1256,17 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>            ProcContainerName++;
>          }
> 
> +        HasPhysicalPackageBit = (Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Flags &
> EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL) ==
> +                                EFI_ACPI_6_3_PPTT_PACKAGE_PHYSICAL;
> +
>          // Recursively continue creating an AML tree.
>          Status = CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>                     Generator,
>                     CfgMgrProtocol,
>                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
>                     ProcContainerNode,
> -                   ProcContainerIndex
> +                   ProcContainerIndex,
> +                   (PackageNodeSeen || HasPhysicalPackageBit)
>                     );
>          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>            ASSERT (0);
> @@ -1311,7 +1322,8 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>               CfgMgrProtocol,
>               CM_NULL_TOKEN,
>               ScopeNode,
> -             &ProcContainerIndex
> +             &ProcContainerIndex,
> +             FALSE
>               );
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>      ASSERT (0);
> --
> 2.34.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#116689): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/116689
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104183075/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-05 19:00 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] DynamicTablesPkg/SSDT: Require Package node in hierarchy Jeshua Smith via groups.io
2024-03-12 16:11 ` Jeshua Smith via groups.io [this message]
2024-03-12 16:14   ` Sami Mujawar
2024-03-13 14:23     ` Sami Mujawar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR12MB3371D7355BA0BE72B1273CABDB2B2@DM6PR12MB3371.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox