From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.993.1589482451089234870 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:54:11 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=PzC80l71; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.233, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:To:In-Reply-To:Cc:References:Message-Id:Date: Mime-Version:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hrK80dPFkxXS0qfCsZFotZUcJllo1+pLziBMpSQz7s0=; b=PzC80l71oBghyv553mV2Ssxb00 cvpprbv+wGkyZDLgszh3H00gbqnQQbsz3xfkaw1XdaTy3DxIDGoxgULIM+gllmtJNrJJJGGEZusMF v2SCBJFS+j1ftlOffLzKgaBjvxLNIe0bRroy0ocn5u5HNin9JYg+nvgRwU+oF/F3KIMQ=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZIzf-0004yb-Ly; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:54:07 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jZIzb-0007Dw-9m; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:54:07 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF67D161105; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:54:02 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2dahCtGkrsLL; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:54:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.145] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92FF7161145; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:54:02 -0600 (MDT) From: "Rebecca Cran" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:54:02 -0600 Message-Id: References: Cc: lersek@redhat.com, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , "Justen, Jordan L" , Peter Grehan In-Reply-To: To: devel@edk2.groups.io, spbrogan@outlook.com X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E262) X-XM-SPF: eid=1jZIzb-0007Dw-9m;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa01 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;devel@edk2.groups.io, spbrogan@outlook.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 4145 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.1 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.8 (0.1%), parse: 1.19 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 4.7 (0.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.68 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.9 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.09 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.87 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 47 (1.1%), check_bayes: 45 (1.1%), b_tokenize: 3.9 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.2 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.20 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 33 (0.8%), b_finish: 0.74 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 4073 (98.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.38 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3939 (95.0%), poll_dns_idle: 3934 (94.9%), tests_pri_10: 1.90 (0.0%), tests_pri_500: 6 (0.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Where to put the bhyve code in the edk2 repo: BhyvePkg, or under OvmfPkg? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On May 14, 2020, at 12:47 PM, Sean wrote:. >=20 > Is there interest in setting it up to "consume" edk2 as is rather than be a= fork?=20 I=E2=80=99m not sure if we=E2=80=99ll switch to having edk2 be a submodule, b= ut I intend to keep master be the same as upstream master, and regularly int= egrate changes into the bhyve/* branches. =E2=80=94=20 Rebecca Cran=