From: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] MdeModulePkg/Xhci: add 1ms delay before access MMIO reg during reset
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:07:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F564815149@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20A29753-8302-4AE0-91FF-F0368C1D7E35@apple.com>
Andrew,
The 100 ns vs. 1 us differences are what I tried to highlight here and propose some helpers to hide that difference.
Do you have some alternatives in mind?
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: afish@apple.com [mailto:afish@apple.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:37 AM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; Tian, Feng <feng.tian@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [patch] MdeModulePkg/Xhci: add 1ms delay before access MMIO reg
> during reset
>
>
> > On Sep 14, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Leif,
> >
> > MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h does have some helper macros for setting timer
> events periods
> > that are in 100 nS units:
> >
> > #define EFI_TIMER_PERIOD_MICROSECONDS(Microseconds)
> MultU64x32((UINT64)(Microseconds), 10)
> > #define EFI_TIMER_PERIOD_MILLISECONDS(Milliseconds)
> MultU64x32((UINT64)(Milliseconds), 10000)
> > #define EFI_TIMER_PERIOD_SECONDS(Seconds) MultU64x32((UINT64)(Seconds),
> 10000000)
> >
> > I believe the examples you show are for use with the gBS->Stall() service which is
> in 1 uS units.
> >
> > Maybe we should consider some additional macros in UefiLib.h
> >
> > #define EFI_STALL_PERIOD_MICROSECONDS(Microseconds) (Microseconds)
> > #define EFI_STALL_PERIOD_MILLISECONDS(Milliseconds) ((Milliseconds) * 1000)
> > #define EFI_STALL_PERIOD_SECONDS(Seconds) ((Seconds) * 1000000)
> >
> > Or maybe some macros that actually do the call to gBS->Stall() too.
> >
> > #define EFI_STALL_MICROSECONDS(Microseconds) gBS->Stall (Microseconds)
> > #define EFI_STALL_MILLISECONDS(Milliseconds) gBS->Stall ((Milliseconds) * 1000)
> > #define EFI_STALL_SECONDS(Seconds) gBS->Stall ((Seconds) * 1000000)
> >
> > The other method of generating timed delays for PEI/DXE/SMM modules is using the
> > Services in MdePkg/Include/Library/TimerLib.h:
> >
> > UINTN
> > EFIAPI
> > NanoSecondDelay (
> > IN UINTN NanoSeconds
> > );
> >
> > UINTN
> > EFIAPI
> > MicroSecondDelay (
> > IN UINTN MicroSeconds
> > );
> >
> > If we wanted macros helper to use these services to match UEFI ones, maybe
> > add the following to TimerLib.h:
> >
> > #define DELAY_NANOSECONDS(Nanoseconds) NanoSecondDelay (Nanoseconds)
> > #define DELAY_MICROSECONDS(Microseconds) MicroSecondDelay (Microseconds)
> > #define DELAY_MILLISECONDS(Milliseconds) MicroSecondDelay ((Microseconds) * 1000)
> > #define DELAY_SECONDS(Seconds) MicroSecondDelay ((Microseconds) *
> 1000000)
> >
> > Do you think it would improve the maintenance of the code if macros like these
> > were used consistently?
> >
>
> MIke,
>
> We have some APIs that are 100ns vs. MIcroSeconds and that causes confusion for
> folks. Maybe we should have some helpers for both APIs and comments about which are
> which to help with the confusion. For example list the APIs that take the 100ns
> argument, and list the APIs that take Microseconds.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Fish
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Leif
> Lindholm
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 6:09 AM
> >> To: Tian, Feng <feng.tian@intel.com>
> >> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [edk2] [patch] MdeModulePkg/Xhci: add 1ms delay before access MMIO
> reg
> >> during reset
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:37:13AM +0800, Feng Tian wrote:
> >>> Some XHCI host controllers require to have extra 1ms delay before
> >>> accessing any MMIO register during HC reset.
> >>
> >> Is this compliant with the XHCI specification or a bug workaround?
> >> I am not going to argue about the delay, but I would like to see it
> >> spelled out in the commit message.
> >>
> >>> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> >>> Signed-off-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.c | 6 +++++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.c
> >> b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.c
> >>> index d0f2205..cb822a6 100644
> >>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.c
> >>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.c
> >>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> >>>
> >>> The XHCI register operation routines.
> >>>
> >>> -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2015, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> >>> +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> >>> This program and the accompanying materials
> >>> are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD License
> >>> which accompanies this distribution. The full text of the license may be found
> at
> >>> @@ -687,6 +687,10 @@ XhcResetHC (
> >>> if ((Xhc->DebugCapSupOffset == 0xFFFFFFFF) || ((XhcReadExtCapReg (Xhc, Xhc-
> >>> DebugCapSupOffset) & 0xFF) != XHC_CAP_USB_DEBUG) ||
> >>> ((XhcReadExtCapReg (Xhc, Xhc->DebugCapSupOffset + XHC_DC_DCCTRL) & BIT0) ==
> >> 0)) {
> >>> XhcSetOpRegBit (Xhc, XHC_USBCMD_OFFSET, XHC_USBCMD_RESET);
> >>> + //
> >>> + // some XHCI host controllers require to have extra 1ms delay before
> accessing
> >> any MMIO register during reset.
> >>> + //
> >>> + gBS->Stall (XHC_1_MILLISECOND);
> >>
> >> OK, so this is not actually a comment on this patch, but why do we
> >> have so many separate definitions of how many microseconds go in a
> >> milisecond or second?
> >>
> >> USB_BUS_1_MILLISECOND (Pei and Dxe)
> >> XHC_1_MILLISECOND (Pei and Dxe)
> >> EHC_1_MILLISECOND (Pei and Dxe)
> >> UHC_1_MILLISECOND (Dxe, Pei defines STALL_1_MILLI_SECOND instead)
> >>
> >> And IdeBusPei/PciBusDxe do similar things.
> >>
> >> Could we add something common to Base.h instead, like the SIZE_ ones,
> >> droppping a lot of duplication, gaining uniformity, and correcting
> >> spelling?
> >>
> >> /
> >> Leif
> >>
> >>> Status = XhcWaitOpRegBit (Xhc, XHC_USBCMD_OFFSET, XHC_USBCMD_RESET, FALSE,
> >> Timeout);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.7.1.windows.2
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> edk2-devel mailing list
> >>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> edk2-devel mailing list
> >> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > edk2-devel mailing list
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 1:37 [patch] MdeModulePkg/Xhci: add 1ms delay before access MMIO reg during reset Feng Tian
2016-09-14 2:58 ` Zeng, Star
2016-09-14 2:59 ` Tian, Feng
2016-09-14 13:08 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-14 17:14 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-14 17:37 ` Andrew Fish
2016-09-14 18:07 ` Kinney, Michael D [this message]
2016-09-15 10:19 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-20 2:01 ` Tian, Feng
2016-09-20 1:39 ` Tian, Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F564815149@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox