From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9822281E08 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:03:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2016 11:03:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,603,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="28138693" Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.7]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2016 11:03:34 -0800 Received: from orsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.13) by ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:03:34 -0800 Received: from orsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.250]) by ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.58]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:03:34 -0800 From: "Kinney, Michael D" To: Blibbet , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Kinney, Michael D" Thread-Topic: [edk2] Unit tests and the EDK2 Thread-Index: AQHSOBQ1WPjkO3yJg0m+4UXmt6yHwqDMu4mA//+UgJA= Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:03:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNWY5YWY5NWEtNDExOC00Yjc2LTkxYmYtODkwMGUzMTM2NTYzIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IlpqVFVsckpWUjhYY2V0XC9lazF6akpVblIwQ2RFZTMrZlljbzMwd3A3WlV3PSJ9 x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Unit tests and the EDK2 X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:03:32 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, A test framework for EDK2 is one of my highest priorities to complete before the end of the year. I am evaluating a number of options and hope to put together=20 a complete proposal as an RFC for consideration in the next=20 few weeks. Thanks, Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Bl= ibbet > Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 9:26 AM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [edk2] Unit tests and the EDK2 >=20 > On 11/06/2016 01:57 AM, Matt Lazarowitz wrote: > > I would like to find out if anyone has experience with an off the shelf > > unit test framework in the EDK2.[...] >=20 > If you haven't looked at it, two months ago Microsoft open-sourced some > EDK2-centric unit tests. >=20 > https://firmwaresecurity.com/2016/09/23/microsoft-uefi-unit-tests/ >=20 > Lee Fisher >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel