From: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add volatile to mNumberToFinish
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:06:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F564857662@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c720463-787b-e8ea-8809-7a0f18da2141@redhat.com>
Laszlo,
Yes. I can split. I will send V2 with your feedback.
For the following line, the cast to (VOID *) before cast to (UINTN) was
required to pass VS build. Since mNumberToFinish is a volatile pointer,
it needs to be cast to a non-volatile pointer before the pointer can be
converted to an unsigned integer value.
TransferApToSafeState ((UINTN)mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack, (UINTN)(VOID *)&mNumberToFinish);
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:22 AM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Fan, Jeff
> <jeff.fan@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add volatile to
> mNumberToFinish
>
> On 11/17/16 06:34, Michael Kinney wrote:
> > Add volatile qualifier to mNumberToFinish to prevent compiler
> > optimization. Also update TransferApToSafeState() to pass in
> > UINTN values and treat the mNumberToFinish as an address value
> > that is passed to the assembly code.
>
> Is it possible to split these actions into two patches? One for
> mNumberToFinish, the other patch for UINTN values.
>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
> > Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > ---
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c | 10 +++++-----
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h | 12 ++++++------
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> > index 3fb6864..4531298 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ AsmGetAddressMap (
> > #define LEGACY_REGION_BASE (0xA0000 - LEGACY_REGION_SIZE)
> >
> > ACPI_CPU_DATA mAcpiCpuData;
> > -UINT32 mNumberToFinish;
> > +volatile UINT32 mNumberToFinish;
> > MP_CPU_EXCHANGE_INFO *mExchangeInfo;
> > BOOLEAN mRestoreSmmConfigurationInS3 = FALSE;
> > VOID *mGdtForAp = NULL;
> > @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ MPRendezvousProcedure (
> > CPU_REGISTER_TABLE *RegisterTableList;
> > UINT32 InitApicId;
> > UINTN Index;
> > - UINT32 TopOfStack;
> > + UINTN TopOfStack;
> > UINT8 Stack[128];
> >
> > ProgramVirtualWireMode ();
> > @@ -403,10 +403,10 @@ MPRendezvousProcedure (
> > //
> > // Place AP into the safe code, count down the number with lock mechanism in the
> safe code.
> > //
> > - TopOfStack = (UINT32) (UINTN) Stack + sizeof (Stack);
> > - TopOfStack &= ~(UINT32) (CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT - 1);
> > + TopOfStack = (UINTN) Stack + sizeof (Stack);
>
> This change looks good.
>
> > + TopOfStack &= ~(CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT - 1);
>
> Please don't drop the UINT32 cast from before the bit-neg altogether,
> instead please turn it into a UINTN cast.
>
> The reason is that CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT has type "int", so the bit-neg
> flips the sign bit too. The resultant value is a negative integer.
>
> Due to the two's complement representation, the negative value is
> actually correct, and when it is converted to UINTN, for the sake of the
> "&" operation that's inherent in "&=", the behavior is correct. But this
> silently relies on two's complement, which in my personal opinion is a
> bad thing. I consider the changing of sign bits with direct bit
> operations a sin :) -- unless mangling the sign bit is our express
> purpose -- so I request that we please convert the int value first to
> the unsigned type with correct width (here, UINTN), and then negate the
> bits.
>
> > CopyMem ((VOID *) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, mApHltLoopCodeTemplate, sizeof
> (mApHltLoopCodeTemplate));
> > - TransferApToSafeState ((UINT32) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack,
> &mNumberToFinish);
> > + TransferApToSafeState ((UINTN)mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack, (UINTN)(VOID
> *)&mNumberToFinish);
> > }
> >
> > /**
>
> The (VOID*) cast is unnecessary here (in the last arg), any pointer can
> be cast to UINTN directly.
>
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > index 9760373..d57eb33 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > @@ -98,23 +98,23 @@ InitGdt (
> > /**
> > Transfer AP to safe hlt-loop after it finished restore CPU features on S3 patch.
> >
> > - @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
> > - @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the
> ApHltLoopCode.
> > - @param[in] NumberToFinish Semaphore of APs finish count.
> > + @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop
> function.
>
> Should we replace "32-bit" with "natural width"?
>
> > + @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the
> ApHltLoopCode.
> > + @param[in] NumberToFinishAddress Address of Semaphore of APs finish count.
> >
> > **/
> > VOID
> > TransferApToSafeState (
> > - IN UINT32 ApHltLoopCode,
> > - IN UINT32 TopOfStack,
> > - IN UINT32 *NumberToFinish
> > + IN UINTN ApHltLoopCode,
> > + IN UINTN TopOfStack,
> > + IN UINTN NumberToFinishAddress
> > )
> > {
> > SwitchStack (
> > - (SWITCH_STACK_ENTRY_POINT) (UINTN) ApHltLoopCode,
> > - NumberToFinish,
> > + (SWITCH_STACK_ENTRY_POINT)ApHltLoopCode,
> > + (VOID *)NumberToFinishAddress,
> > NULL,
> > - (VOID *) (UINTN) TopOfStack
> > + (VOID *)TopOfStack
> > );
> > //
> > // It should never reach here
>
> Looks okay.
>
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> > index 88d9c85..38dd9fa 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> > @@ -828,16 +828,16 @@ GetAcpiS3EnableFlag (
> > /**
> > Transfer AP to safe hlt-loop after it finished restore CPU features on S3 patch.
> >
> > - @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
> > - @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the
> ApHltLoopCode.
> > - @param[in] NumberToFinish Semaphore of APs finish count.
> > + @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop
> function.
>
> If we update the comment, we should do it here too.
>
> > + @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the
> ApHltLoopCode.
> > + @param[in] NumberToFinishAddress Address of Semaphore of APs finish count.
> >
> > **/
> > VOID
> > TransferApToSafeState (
> > - IN UINT32 ApHltLoopCode,
> > - IN UINT32 TopOfStack,
> > - IN UINT32 *NumberToFinish
> > + IN UINTN ApHltLoopCode,
> > + IN UINTN TopOfStack,
> > + IN UINTN NumberToFinishAddress
> > );
> >
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > index 6844c3f..d45fed2 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> > @@ -103,24 +103,24 @@ GetProtectedModeCS (
> > /**
> > Transfer AP to safe hlt-loop after it finished restore CPU features on S3 patch.
> >
> > - @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
>
> and here
>
> > - @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the
> ApHltLoopCode.
> > - @param[in] NumberToFinish Semaphore of APs finish count.
> > + @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop
> function.
> > + @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the
> ApHltLoopCode.
> > + @param[in] NumberToFinishAddress Address of Semaphore of APs finish count.
> >
> > **/
> > VOID
> > TransferApToSafeState (
> > - IN UINT32 ApHltLoopCode,
> > - IN UINT32 TopOfStack,
> > - IN UINT32 *NumberToFinish
> > + IN UINTN ApHltLoopCode,
> > + IN UINTN TopOfStack,
> > + IN UINTN NumberToFinishAddress
> > )
> > {
> > AsmDisablePaging64 (
> > GetProtectedModeCS (),
> > - (UINT32) (UINTN) ApHltLoopCode,
> > - (UINT32) (UINTN) NumberToFinish,
> > + (UINT32)ApHltLoopCode,
> > + (UINT32)NumberToFinishAddress,
> > 0,
> > - TopOfStack
> > + (UINT32)TopOfStack
> > );
> > //
> > // It should never reach here
> >
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-17 5:34 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add volatile to mNumberToFinish Michael Kinney
2016-11-17 10:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-17 16:06 ` Kinney, Michael D [this message]
2016-11-17 20:59 ` Kinney, Michael D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F564857662@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox