From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Permerror (SPF Permanent Error: More than 10 MX records returned) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.88; helo=mga01.intel.com; envelope-from=michael.d.kinney@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8597322137D80 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:14:42 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Dec 2017 09:19:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,405,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="18574805" Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.7]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2017 09:19:24 -0800 Received: from orsmsx158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.20) by ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:19:23 -0800 Received: from orsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.187]) by ORSMSX158.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.25]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:19:23 -0800 From: "Kinney, Michael D" To: Leif Lindholm , Evan Lloyd , "Kinney, Michael D" CC: "edk2-devel (edk2-devel@lists.01.org)" , "Ard Biesheuvel" Thread-Topic: [edk2] [staging/DynamicTables] What about edk2-platforms. Thread-Index: AQHTdaZaexlslzcoyUS+XArE5RoLWqNEpiXA Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:19:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20171215131213.crwu2pqbjfoomvw3@bivouac.eciton.net> In-Reply-To: <20171215131213.crwu2pqbjfoomvw3@bivouac.eciton.net> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [staging/DynamicTables] What about edk2-platforms. X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:14:42 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like this idea the best.=20 Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel- > bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Leif Lindholm > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 5:12 AM > To: Evan Lloyd > Cc: edk2-devel (edk2-devel@lists.01.org) devel@lists.01.org>; Ard Biesheuvel > > Subject: Re: [edk2] [staging/DynamicTables] What about > edk2-platforms. >=20 > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 06:38:14PM +0000, Evan Lloyd > wrote: > > We are about to submit a new (ACPI 6.2) version of > Sami's Dynamic Tables module. > > As suggested in previous threads, the aim is to > submit it to edk2-staging. > > To that end, following the instructions at > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2- > staging/blob/about/README > > (paragraph 4 a) "Maintainer sends patch email to > edk2-devel", we need to generate a patch. > > > > The problem is that the patch involves modules in > both edk2 and edk2-platforms. > > What is the best strategy to use for that scenario? > > Is there any plan to have an edk2-platforms-staging? > > If not, we could roll the bits of platforms into > edk2-staging, but that may engender problems later. > > Does anyone have any advice on how best to handle > this, please? >=20 > As a third responder, I feel obliged to offer a third > opinion. >=20 > My instinctive reaction is to set up a devel- > dynamictables branch in > edk2-platforms, that rebases periodically on master and > maintains > alignment as required with the edk2-staging branch. >=20 > / > Leif > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel