public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
	"Song, BinX" <binx.song@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Keep library class header file definition independent
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:33:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5A7DEE18B@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <195703e3-0831-80a7-b3c4-f44116c06aee@Intel.com>

Ray,

I agree.  The max should not be in the lib class
header file.  

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
> bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Ni, Ruiyu
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:02 PM
> To: Song, BinX <binx.song@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: lersek@redhat.com; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Keep library
> class header file definition independent
> 
> On 12/14/2017 4:31 PM, Song, BinX wrote:
> > Keep library class header file definition independent
> >
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement
> 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> | 7 +++----
> >
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFe
> aturesLib.c | 7 ++-----
> >   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> > index fc3ccda..9582ad8 100644
> > ---
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> > +++
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
> > @@ -71,12 +71,11 @@
> >   #define CPU_FEATURE_APIC_TPR_UPDATE_MESSAGE
> (32+9)
> >   #define CPU_FEATURE_ENERGY_PERFORMANCE_BIAS
> (32+10)
> >   #define CPU_FEATURE_PPIN
> (32+11)
> > +#define CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE
> (32+12)
> >   //
> > -// Currently, CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE is the MAX
> feature we support.
> > -// If you define a feature bigger than it, please
> also replace it
> > -// in RegisterCpuFeatureLibIsFeatureValid function.
> > +// Please keep CPU_FEATURE_MAX as the max CPU
> feature
> >   //
> > -#define CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE
> (32+12)
> > +#define CPU_FEATURE_MAX
> (32+12)
> I think we need to define this CPU_FEATURE_MAX in
> RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c.
> 
> Thinking about another instance of
> RegisterCpuFeatureLib
> that only supports features up to (32+9).
> The MAX will be 32+9 for that instance.
> The library class header only defines the features and
> corresponding ID (32+xx).
> Library instance chooses which features to support.
> 
> >
> >   #define CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE_ALL
> BIT27
> >   #define CPU_FEATURE_AFTER_ALL
> BIT28
> > diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpu
> FeaturesLib.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpu
> FeaturesLib.c
> > index 6ec26e1..911f4d0 100644
> > ---
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpu
> FeaturesLib.c
> > +++
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpu
> FeaturesLib.c
> > @@ -97,11 +97,8 @@
> RegisterCpuFeatureLibIsFeatureValid (
> >
> >     Data = Feature;
> >     Data &= ~(CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER
> | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE_ALL | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER_ALL);
> > -  //
> > -  // Currently, CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE is the MAX
> feature we support.
> > -  // If you define a feature bigger than it, please
> replace it at below.
> > -  //
> > -  if (Data > CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE) {
> > +
> > +  if (Data > CPU_FEATURE_MAX) {
> >       DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Invalid CPU feature: 0x%x
> ", Feature));
> >       return FALSE;
> >     }
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Ray
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-15 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-14  8:31 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Keep library class header file definition independent Song, BinX
2017-12-15  5:02 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-12-15 17:33   ` Kinney, Michael D [this message]
2017-12-18  5:17     ` Song, BinX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5A7DEE18B@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox