From: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add Platform Include path in modules
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:25:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B896C4FD@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76e5168a-e3c2-97bb-dac1-22ffc212c7ee@redhat.com>
Hi Pankaj,
I agree with Laszlo that you should evaluate use of
PCDs. There are a few methods for a driver to use
platform specific values/behavior. These are:
* PCDs
* Library class/Library Instance
* Protocol/PPI
One issue with the proposal is that it adds a hidden
dependency to modules. An EDK II INF file describes
the external interfaces of a module along with
produces/consumes usage. This information is aligned
with the XML schema that is documented in the UEFI
Platform Initialization Distribution Packaging Specification.
http://uefi.org/specifications
If two modules have the same GUID/Version, then the external
interfaces to those two modules are expected to be identical.
With your proposal, two modules built for 2 different platforms
would have the same GUID/Version but would not have the same
external interfaces because a hidden dependency on a platform
package was added.
If a module really needs to use content from a platform
package, then a new copy of the module should be created
with a new GUID/Version and the platform package added to
the [Packages] section. The other option is to use one
of the supported interfaces (PCDs, Lib, Protocol, PPI).
Please let us know if any of these exiting methods do not
work for your use case.
Thanks,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 7:55 AM
> To: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Add Platform Include path in
> modules
>
> On 02/26/18 11:55, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Consider a simple driver which needs that some data
> structures be
> > filled by the Platform, which is using the driver.
> >
> > Driver.c #include <Platform.h>
> >
> > Struct a = platformVal;
> >
> > We can define platformVal in Platform.h, which would
> be unique to the
> > platform being built. This Platform.h can be placed in
> include
> > directories, whose path would be defined in
> Platform.dec file.
> >
> > Now, whenever we build driver for each unique
> platform, we need not
> > to mention Platform.dec file in driver.inf [packages]
> section. We can
> > append Platform.dec include paths to each driver. i.e.
> look for the
> > include files in [packages] section as well as in
> Platform include
> > directories.
> >
> > For this, I am looking for Platform.dec file in same
> directory as
> > Platform.dsc and using same name as Platform.dsc
> >
> > We can refine this change further. i.e. add Platform
> include
> > directories to driver's include paths based on some
> condition in
> > driver.inf file.
>
> (Apologies in advance if I failed to grasp the use
> case.)
>
> If I understand correctly, you have multiple platforms
> (defined by DSC
> and FDF files), and you build a given driver for several
> of these
> platforms, separately. And, when building the driver for
> the separate
> platforms, you'd like the driver to get different
> initializers for
> various static (global) structure variables.
>
> Have you tried the structured PCD format? I think that
> could cover your
> use case.
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't find anything about structured
> PCDs in the edk2
> specs, but there are several BZ references in the
> following mailing list
> message:
>
> [edk2] [Patch 00/14] Enable Structure PCD support in
> edk2
>
> http://mid.mail-archive.com/1512140335-6932-1-git-send-
> email-liming.gao@intel.com
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 6:28 [RFC] Add Platform Include path in modules Pankaj Bansal
2018-02-26 7:42 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-02-26 10:55 ` Pankaj Bansal
2018-02-26 15:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-26 17:25 ` Kinney, Michael D [this message]
2018-02-27 7:39 ` Pankaj Bansal
2018-02-27 11:21 ` Gao, Liming
2018-03-09 10:54 ` Pankaj Bansal
2018-03-09 17:29 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-02-26 12:55 ` [RFC v2] " Pankaj Bansal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B896C4FD@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox