From: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>, "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: Remove dead code in .c and .h files
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 17:36:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B8AA17DC@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cbf157b-6799-f7fd-16b5-71e121e8dc53@redhat.com>
Laszlo,
I agree for a patch like this that one patch
per module makes more sense.
We also need to make sure that this series is
tested with all supported compilers and CPU
architectures to make sure code is not being
removed that is required for a combination that
was missed.
Thanks,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-
> bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 6:12 AM
> To: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: Remove dead
> code in .c and .h files
>
> On 08/06/18 09:49, shenglei wrote:
> > Some dead code has been removed in .c and .h files.
> > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
> >
> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement
> 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../Application/CapsuleApp/CapsuleDump.c | 31
> ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/FrontPage.c | 40
> ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/Ui.h | 30
> --
> > .../Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AhciMode.c | 104
> -------
> > .../Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/IdeMode.c | 257
> ------------------
> > .../Bus/Isa/Ps2KeyboardDxe/Ps2KbdCtrller.c | 26
> --
> > .../Bus/Isa/Ps2KeyboardDxe/Ps2Keyboard.h | 12
> -
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/EhciDxe/EhciDebug.c | 27
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/EhciDxe/EhciDebug.h | 11
> -
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/EhciDxe/EhciReg.c | 44
> ---
> > .../Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe/NvmExpressHci.c | 110
> --------
> > .../Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciDeviceSupport.c | 80
> ------
> > .../Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciDeviceSupport.h | 17
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciIo.c | 41
> ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciIo.h | 21
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdDevice.c | 94
> -------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/UhciPei/DmaMem.c | 22
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/UhciPei/UhcPeim.c | 125
> ---------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/UhciPei/UhcPeim.h | 78
> ------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.c | 66
> -----
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe/XhciReg.h | 28
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciPei/UsbHcMem.c | 24
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciPei/XhcPeim.c | 22
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciPei/XhciReg.h | 14
> -
> > .../Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei/EmmcHcMem.c | 24
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei/SdHcMem.c | 24
> --
> > .../Bus/Ufs/UfsBlockIoPei/UfsBlockIoPei.c | 101
> -------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ufs/UfsBlockIoPei/UfsHcMem.c | 24
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ufs/UfsBlockIoPei/UfsHci.c | 180
> ------------
> > .../Bus/Ufs/UfsPassThruDxe/UfsPassThruHci.c | 49
> ----
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBotPei/PeiUsbLib.c | 190
> -------------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBotPei/PeiUsbLib.h | 98
> -------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbHub.c | 68
> -----
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbUtility.c | 146
> ----------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe/UsbUtility.h | 114
> --------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusPei/HubPeim.c | 39
> ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusPei/HubPeim.h | 18
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusPei/PeiUsbLib.c | 77
> ------
> > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusPei/PeiUsbLib.h | 35
> ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain.h | 13
> -
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain/DxeMain.c | 23
> --
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/HeapGuard.c | 78
> ------
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/HeapGuard.c | 166
> -----------
> > .../Core/PiSmmCore/MemoryAttributesTable.c | 131
> ---------
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/Page.c | 121
> ---------
> > .../Universal/Console/TerminalDxe/Terminal.h | 12
> -
> > .../Console/TerminalDxe/TerminalConIn.c | 25
> --
> > .../Universal/HiiDatabaseDxe/ConfigRouting.c | 47
> ----
> > .../Universal/Network/IScsiDxe/IScsiProto.c | 31
> ---
> > .../Universal/Network/Ip4Dxe/Ip4Config2Impl.c | 16
> --
> > .../Universal/Network/Tcp4Dxe/SockImpl.c | 35
> ---
> > .../Universal/Network/Tcp4Dxe/SockInterface.c | 41
> ---
> > .../Universal/Network/Tcp4Dxe/Socket.h | 32
> ---
> > .../Universal/Network/Tcp4Dxe/Tcp4Option.c | 28
> --
> > .../Universal/Network/Tcp4Dxe/Tcp4Option.h | 15
> -
> > .../Universal/SetupBrowserDxe/IfrParse.c | 33
> ---
> > 56 files changed, 3358 deletions(-)
>
> Please split this patch up to a series so that *at the
> least* each
> module is covered by a separate patch. For example,
>
> 1 MdeModulePkg/Application/CapsuleApp
> 2 MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp
> 3 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru
> 4 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Isa/Ps2KeyboardDxe
> 5 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/EhciDxe
> 6 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/NvmExpressDxe
> 7 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe
> 8 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe
> 9 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/UhciPei
> 10 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciDxe
> 11 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/XhciPei
> 12 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/EmmcBlockIoPei
> 13 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Sd/SdBlockIoPei
> 14 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ufs/UfsBlockIoPei
> 15 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ufs/UfsPassThruDxe
> 16 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBotPei
> 17 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusDxe
> 18 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Usb/UsbBusPei
> 19 MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe
> 20 MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore
> 21 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/TerminalDxe
> 22 MdeModulePkg/Universal/HiiDatabaseDxe
> 23 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/IScsiDxe
> 24 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Ip4Dxe
> 25 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Tcp4Dxe
> 26 MdeModulePkg/Universal/SetupBrowserDxe
>
> Removing 3358 lines, under a blanket "dead code"
> comment, across 26
> drivers, is terribly bad practice, in my opinion. It's
> unreviewable, and
> also unbisectable if something goes wrong.
>
> The bug report
> <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062>
> states,
>
> Uefi-aware compiler found many modules have dead
> code and redundant
> definitions in the MdeModulePkg. Please see the
> detail info in the
> attachment log. We need to clean them.
>
> Because the module number is big, I report them all
> together by
> package in this tracker and don't by modules
> separately.
>
> Please be aware that there might be false positives
> in the log. The
> Uefi-aware compiler currently only analyze the C
> code and has not
> supported the assemble code yet. So, if a function
> is only invoked
> by assemble code, the Uefi-aware compiler might
> miss it and report
> it as dead code. Please verify them carefully if
> the module have
> assemble code.
>
> The bug report itself states that there might be false
> positives in the
> log and that at least some cases have to be evaluated
> carefully. It's
> exactly that evaluation that should be captured in each
> commit message.
> The fact that the module number is big is *exactly* the
> reason why the
> patch series should be fine-grained.
>
> Many of these modules are consumed by most platforms in
> existence. If a
> platform owner would like to take a look at a small
> subset of the
> modules being modified here, they now have to dig
> around in a 3+ KLOC
> patch, and figure it out for themselves *why* some code
> is called "dead".
>
> Star, Eric, what are your takes on this? Do you agree
> with my request
> above, or do you prefer the patch in its current form?
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-06 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-06 7:49 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: Remove dead code in .c and .h files shenglei
2018-08-06 13:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-06 14:54 ` Gao, Liming
2018-08-06 15:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-06 15:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-08-06 17:36 ` Kinney, Michael D [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B8AA17DC@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox