From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.65; helo=mga03.intel.com; envelope-from=michael.d.kinney@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B83A72118F793 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:20:44 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Nov 2018 15:20:44 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,258,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="109821234" Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.7]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2018 15:20:43 -0800 Received: from orsmsx161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.84) by ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:20:43 -0800 Received: from orsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.125]) by ORSMSX161.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:20:43 -0800 From: "Kinney, Michael D" To: Leif Lindholm , "Ni, Ruiyu" , "Kinney, Michael D" CC: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Gao, Liming" , "Richardson, Brian" , "Cetola, Stephano" , Laszlo Ersek Thread-Topic: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to remove DuetPkg Thread-Index: AdSAkVEH3t8YAUlcRUmbSZvxBs7M8QAaS8QAAAs/d/A= Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 23:20:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BF0FF83@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20181120095728.bupflsmqgmpkun5w@bivouac.eciton.net> In-Reply-To: <20181120095728.bupflsmqgmpkun5w@bivouac.eciton.net> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal to remove DuetPkg X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 23:20:44 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree with this proposal. I also agree with Leif that large patch series must be shared on a branch for review. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] > On Behalf Of Leif Lindholm > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:57 AM > To: Ni, Ruiyu > Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Gao, Liming > ; Richardson, Brian > ; Cetola, Stephano > ; Kinney, Michael D > ; Laszlo Ersek > > Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to remove DuetPkg >=20 > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:27:13AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu > wrote: > > All, > > DuetPkg depends on Legacy BIOS to provide a UEFI > environment. It was > > invented in the era when UEFI environment is hard to > find. Since now > > UEFI is very popular in PC area, we could stop the > official support > > of this package and remove it from the master. > > Anyone who wants to use it still can just grab it from > git > > history. This is the same as what we did for IPF > contents. > > > > If there is no concern by end of November, we will send > out a formal > > patch to remove DuetPkg. (Since DuetPkg is big, we will > not generate > > the huge patch using git command, instead we will just > send out the > > patch mail with correct title/commit message but empty > content.) >=20 > Works for me. If you could include a link to the patch in > a branch > where it can be reviewed, that would be ideal. >=20 > / > Leif >=20 > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel