public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:09:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9C6CE6D@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319175856.g2sao3bdsyseaxa2@bivouac.eciton.net>

Leif and Jordan,

Would you mind putting together a specific proposal
and perhaps some links to other projects that use
the same approach?

I am happy to update the RFC to V3 to address this 
topic if we can close on it quickly.

Thanks,

Mike


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindholm@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 10:59 AM
> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; edk2-
> devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent
> License
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I see where Jordan is coming from here.
> 
> It isn't just about losing the comment in
> Contriutions.txt - there are
> bits in the actual TianoCore Contribution Agreement that
> cover the
> same things as https://developercertificate.org/ (that
> are not
> explicitly called out elsewhere in the existing
> Contributions.txt).
> 
> Like Jordan says, we wouldn't be the first project that
> use
> Signed-off-by without specifying exactly what it means,
> but I think
> we're one of the ones that actually care quite a bit.
> 
> I could live with us not resolving this at the same time
> as the
> license change, but I would prefer if we did...
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Leif
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:25:54PM +0000, Kinney, Michael
> D wrote:
> > Hi Jordan,
> >
> > No proposed changes to the Signed-off-by tags.  If you
> have
> > a proposal, please provide an RFC or bring to the
> monthly
> > EDK II community meeting.
> >
> > This series is focused on the license change, the use
> of SPDX
> > identifiers, and removing the Contributed-under tag
> from
> > commit messages.
> >
> > I will update the V2 version of the patch series in to
> make
> > sure the content from Contributions.txt that is not
> part of
> > the TianoCore Contribution Agreement is added to
> Readme.md.
> >
> > The RFC mentioned the need to update documentation.  I
> will
> > send that out as a separate Wiki patch series for
> review.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Justen, Jordan L
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:04 AM
> > > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to
> BSD+Patent
> > > License
> > >
> > > On 2019-03-13 10:54:22, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 84141eacac edk2: Remove Contributions.txt and
> update
> > > Readme.md
> > >
> > > I guess this removes the requirement for the
> > > 'Contributed-under' tag
> > > in commit messages?
> > >
> > > But, what about Signed-off-by? Is it desirable to
> > > remove that
> > > requirement?
> > >
> > > Relatedly, some open source projects have
> standardized
> > > on tying the
> > > Signed-off-by to this text:
> > >
> > > https://developercertificate.org/
> > >
> > > So, the contributor doesn't have to agree to give the
> > > project the
> > > contribution under the Contributed-under terms, but
> > > they still
> > > indicate that they believe that the project can use
> the
> > > code under the
> > > project's indicated license.
> > >
> > > There is also other information in Contributions.txt
> > > that appears to
> > > have been deleted, rather than moved. I guess it is
> > > mostly duplicated
> > > on the wiki. That doesn't mean it's not a good idea
> to
> > > duplicate it in
> > > the source tree, or at least provide a web-link. It
> > > seems like the
> > > first place devs might look for such information is
> > > either the readme,
> > > or Contributions.txt.
> > >
> > > Regarding the wiki, I guess it has to be updated
> after
> > > this change is
> > > made. It might be good to add that to the bug so it
> > > can't be closed
> > > until that is fixed.
> > >
> > > How about updating BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py?
> > >
> > > -Jordan
> > _______________________________________________
> > edk2-devel mailing list
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 17:54 PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-14 10:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-14 19:06   ` Julien Grall
     [not found]     ` <8F40F2BF-B40F-4338-A832-70AE84B26408@citrix.com>
2019-03-15  9:35       ` Julien Grall
     [not found]         ` <6FBC013D-4BC9-454C-9D4D-87C96F435704@citrix.com>
2019-03-15 17:18           ` Julien Grall
     [not found]             ` <C2A0176C-8197-421A-9CA9-2B416DF17EAB@citrix.com>
2019-03-20 12:09               ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-23  0:44                 ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-25 10:04                   ` Laszlo Ersek
     [not found]               ` <720E0EE9-2AED-4110-827D-B87DE5F52862@citrix.com>
2019-03-20 18:25                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-20 18:42                   ` Julien Grall
2019-03-20 20:03                     ` Laszlo Ersek
     [not found]                   ` <8A1C7ED9-000A-4EBB-A196-10CE5B9B522F@citrix.com>
2019-03-21 17:41                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-18 18:17   ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-14 18:03 ` Jordan Justen
2019-03-18 18:25   ` Kinney, Michael D
2019-03-18 19:42     ` Jordan Justen
2019-03-19 17:58     ` Leif Lindholm
2019-03-19 19:09       ` Kinney, Michael D [this message]
2019-03-19 19:57         ` Jordan Justen
2019-03-19 20:06         ` Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9C6CE6D@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox