public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers please test the pull request commit gate
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:21:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E012E4@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <927a6e50-1106-92d1-3480-4d4492ca2340@redhat.com>

Laszlo,

Agreed.  A GitHub fork is required.  We can make that clear
in the developer process wiki.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On
> Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 9:12 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers please test
> the pull request commit gate
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On 11/07/19 20:26, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> > Laszlo,
> >
> > The hub command line utility also shows an option to
> create a fork
> > without using the GitHub UI.  But since I already have
> all the
> > relevant forks I needed, I have not tried this feature
> yet.
> 
> sorry, I was unclear with my "fork on github.com"
> adjustment.
> 
> I didn't mean that people were required to use the
> github *UI* for the fork operation.
> 
> Instead, I meant that the data store inside <github.com>
> had to learn about the "fork relationship" between the
> tianocore/edk2-staging repo, and the
> <MaintainerAccount>/edk2-staging repo.
> 
> Because, in my vocabulary, if I enter my local *edk2*
> clone, and run the following commands:
> 
> $ git remote add -f --no-tags staging \
>     https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging.git
> $ git checkout -b ci-test-1 staging/edk2-ci $ [modify
> files] $ git add ...
> $ git commit
> $ git push lersek-edk2 ci-test-1
> 
> then I *have* forked the edk2-staging repo. It's because
> now I'm exposing a public topic branch that is the
> derivative of the edk2-staging/edk2-ci branch.
> 
> But, this is not what the test procedure requires. The
> test procedure requires each maintainer to tell github
> explicitly, "I am now forking edk2-staging under my
> account, the way github (re)defines 'forking'".
> That's *not* what "forking" means in base git
> terminology, in my opinion, regardless of whether a
> maintainer implements the github kind of forking on the
> github WebUI, or with the "hub" command line utility.
> 
> In brief, I wanted to say, "what github (the service)
> calls a fork is quite a bit more restrictive than what
> base git calls a fork, so please let's clearly require
> the github kind in the instructions".
> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 3:01 AM
> >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> >> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers please
> test the pull
> >> request commit gate
> >>
> >> On 11/07/19 03:24, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> >>> EDK II Maintainers,
> >>>
> >>> Please take a few minutes to test the GitHub pull
> >> request commit gate
> >>> feature under review in the edk2-staging/edk2-ci
> >> branch.  This will be
> >>> the only method to push patches to the edk2 repo in
> >> the near future,
> >>> and we want all current EDK II Maintainers to make
> >> sure they know how
> >>> to use this new process on the edk2-staging repo
> >> before it is
> >>> activated on the
> >>> edk2 repo.
> >>>
> >>> Please perform the following steps:
> >>> * Create a personal fork of the edk2-staging repo.
> >>
> >> Slight but relevant clarification: please create a
> personal fork of
> >> the edk2-staging repo *on GitHub.com*.
> >>
> >>> * Check out the edk2-ci branch from your personal
> >>>   fork of the edk2-staging repo
> >>> * Create a new branch based on the edk2-ci branch
> >>> * Edit the file SampleFile.txt in the root of this
> >>>   branch and add an Acked-by: <your email> tag to
> >>>   the end of this file.
> >>> * Submit a pull request against the Tianocore
> >>>   edk2-staging/edk2-ci.  Set the 'push' label so
> >>>   the change to SampleFile.txt will be committed
> >>>   if all checks pass.
> >>>
> >>>   NOTE: Make sure you select the 'edk2-ci' branch.
> >>>   The default branch for the edk2-staging repo is
> >>>   the 'about' branch and the pull request will not
> >>>   work against the 'about' branch.
> >>>
> >>> * Verify that all checks pass and your change to
> >>>   SampleFile.txt was merged into the
> >>>   edk2-staging/edk2-ci branch.
> >>>
> >>> For those that prefer command line tools over a
> WebUI,
> >> the command
> >>> line utility called 'hub' can be used to submit a
> pull
> >> request and
> >>> check the status of a pull request.
> >>>
> >>> * https://github.com/github/hub
> >>> * https://github.com/github/hub/releases
> >>> * https://hub.github.com/hub.1.html
> >>
> >> I've gone through the above (except the personal
> Acked- by tag)
> >> earlier,
> >> successfully:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging/pull/99
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Laszlo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07  2:24 EDK II Maintainers please test the pull request commit gate Michael D Kinney
2019-11-07 11:00 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-07 15:18   ` Liming Gao
2019-11-07 19:33     ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-07 19:26   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-08 17:12     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-08 17:21       ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
2019-11-08 14:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-11-08 17:10   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-08 17:43     ` rebecca
2019-11-11  5:42 ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E012E4@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox