From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"tigerliu@zhaoxin.com" <tigerliu@zhaoxin.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2] AP core : call GetPeiServicesTablePointer function hang
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 16:27:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E1F185@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <709781e4707348378a93386b0d4cb3cb@zhaoxin.com>
PEI Phase execution environment is focused on BSP execution.
The PEI Services and most of the PPI services are not designed
to be MP safe. Since it is not safe for an AP to call PEI Services,
the IDT entry with the pointer to the PEI Service Table is
not available to an AP to prevent code from incorrectly calling
a PEI Service from an AP.
It is legal to run code on an AP in the PEI Phase, but the
code executed must be carefully designed to not use PEI Services
and is usually designed to execute using only stack/memory and
system resources that have assigned for exclusive access by an AP.
This is usually communicated from BSP to an AP through a mailbox
in memory. If an AP needs something like a PEI Service (e.g.
memory allocation or logging), then the AP should make that
request to the BSP to perform that operation for the AP.
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On
> Behalf Of Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 1:08 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [edk2] AP core : call
> GetPeiServicesTablePointer function hang
>
> Dear All:
> I met a question during debug multi-processor code.
>
> I found if AP's procedure call
> GetPeiServicesTablePointer function , then it would
> hang.
> GetPeiServicesTablePointer (
> VOID
> )
> {
> CONST EFI_PEI_SERVICES **PeiServices;
> IA32_DESCRIPTOR Idtr;
>
> AsmReadIdtr (&Idtr);
> PeiServices = (CONST EFI_PEI_SERVICES **)
> (*(UINTN*)(Idtr.Base - sizeof (UINTN)));
> ASSERT (PeiServices != NULL);
> return PeiServices;
> }
>
> It seems BSP and AP use different IDT table? Why?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> 保密声明:
> 本邮件含有保密或专有信息,仅供指定收件人使用。严禁对本邮件或其内容
> 做任何未经授权的查阅、使用、复制或转发。
> CONFIDENTIAL NOTE:
> This email contains confidential or legally privileged
> information and is for the sole use of its intended
> recipient. Any unauthorized review, use, copying or
> forwarding of this email or the content of this email
> is strictly prohibited.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-18 9:08 [edk2-devel] [edk2] AP core : call GetPeiServicesTablePointer function hang Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)
2019-11-18 16:27 ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-19 1:20 Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)
2019-11-19 1:51 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-19 2:37 Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E1F185@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox