From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>,
"Bret Barkelew" <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers - EDK II CI is now active on edk2/master
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 18:17:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E58033@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443759e-a8a1-2c5f-4892-0ff740e948ba@redhat.com>
Laszlo,
Sorry for the delay in getting to these PactchCheck.py updates.
I know it is frustrating to be blocked by these types of issues.
I try to look at 2406 tomorrow. I think the manual override is
potentially more complex to implement than the requested changed
to PatchCheck.py.
You were on the correct link. If you clicked one more level on
"Bash exited with code '255'" link on that web page, it takes you
to the patch check log that shows 3 errors for commit message
subject lines being too long.
https://dev.azure.com/tianocore/edk2-ci/_build/results?buildId=3459&view=logs&j=12f1170f-54f2-53f3-20dd-22fc7dff55f9&t=9c939e41-62c2-5605-5e05-fc3554afc9f5&l=149
Best regards,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 9:29 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Sean Brogan
> <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>; Bret Barkelew
> <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>; Gao, Liming
> <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers - EDK II
> CI is now active on edk2/master
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 11/12/19 03:55, Michael D Kinney wrote:
> > EDK II Maintainers,
> >
> > EDK II CI Phase 1 feature is now active on
> edk2/master.
> >
> > Please use a GitHub pull request from a branch in a
> personal
> > fork of the edk2 repository with a 'push' label to
> request
> > a set of patches to be pushed to edk2/master. The
> GitHub PR
> > replaces the 'git push' operation currently used to
> commit
> > changes to edk2/master.
> >
> > You will need to configure your notifications from
> the edk2
> > repository to make sure you receive email
> notifications
> > when the checks against the GitHub PR passes or
> fails.
> >
> > If you submit a GitHub Pull Request without the
> 'push'
> > label, then the CI checks are run and the results are
> > generated.
> >
> > Please let us know if there are any questions about
> this
> > change in the development process.
>
> I had filed
>
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2406
>
> a month ago, about PatchCheck.py being too strict, and
> blocking pull requests unjustifiedly.
>
> Now I realize I can't even review the results (= the
> PatchCheck.py error messages) on github.com and/or on
> Azure Pipelines:
>
>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/272/checks?check
> _run_id=375969977
> https://dev.azure.com/tianocore/11ea4a10-ac9f-4e5f-
> 8b13-7def1f19d478/_build/results?buildId=3456
>
> Am I looking in the wrong place perhaps?
>
> Can we please add a manual PatchCheck.py override on
> github.com for those maintainers that are permitted to
> set the "push" label already?
>
> TianoCore#2406 doesn't seem to be getting any
> attention, and it is blocking actual development work.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 2:55 EDK II Maintainers - EDK II CI is now active on edk2/master Michael D Kinney
2019-11-12 8:56 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-12 19:50 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-12 19:52 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-13 7:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-13 8:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-13 16:23 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-13 17:03 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-26 8:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-27 19:03 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-11-28 12:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-02 19:55 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-12-03 8:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-03 17:07 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-12-03 20:39 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-06 11:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-12-06 11:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-02 14:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-02 18:36 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-01-06 14:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-03 13:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-06 17:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-06 18:17 ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
2020-01-07 9:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-09 21:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-09 21:37 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-01-10 10:51 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-08 11:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-08 19:21 Sean
2020-03-08 19:53 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-03-09 19:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-09 19:32 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-09 22:00 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-03-09 19:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-09 20:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-09 21:44 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-03-10 7:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E58033@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox