From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "Sukerkar, Amol N" <amol.n.sukerkar@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Agrawal, Sachin" <sachin.agrawal@intel.com>,
"Musti, Srinivas" <srinivas.musti@intel.com>,
"Lakkimsetti, Subash" <subash.lakkimsetti@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] SecurityPkg/BaseHashLib: Implement Unified Hash Calculation API
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:52:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E5EAF0@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115225730.1330-1-amol.n.sukerkar@intel.com>
Amol,
I still think the handle based registration is too
complex for this feature.
I recommend a simpler lib design and add it to
CryptoPkg instead of SecurityPkg. Providing a
different method to access the hashing functions
in BaseCryptLib is not a Security feature, it is
a Crypto feature.
Thanks,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sukerkar, Amol N <amol.n.sukerkar@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:57 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
> Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J
> <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Agrawal, Sachin
> <sachin.agrawal@intel.com>; Musti, Srinivas
> <srinivas.musti@intel.com>; Lakkimsetti, Subash
> <subash.lakkimsetti@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] SecurityPkg/BaseHashLib:
> Implement Unified Hash Calculation API
>
> Currently, the UEFI drivers using the SHA/SM3 hashing
> algorithms use hard-coded
> API to calculate the hash, for instance, sha_256(...),
> etc. Since SHA384 and/or
> SM3_256 are being increasingly adopted for robustness,
> it becomes cumbersome to
> modify each driver that calls into hash calculating
> API.
>
> To better achieve this, we are proposing a Unified API,
> which can be used by UEFI
> drivers, that provides the drivers with flexibility to
> use the desired hashing
> algorithm based on the required robnustness.
>
> Alternatively, the design document is also attached to
> Bugzilla,
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2151.
>
> Sukerkar, Amol N (1):
> SecurityPkg/BaseHashLib: Implement Unified Hash
> Calculation API
>
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibCommon.c |
> 151 ++++++++++++++++++++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibDxe.c |
> 100 +++++++++++++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibPei.c |
> 103 +++++++++++++
> SecurityPkg/Include/Library/BaseHashLib.h |
> 85 +++++++++++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibCommon.h |
> 141 ++++++++++++++++++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibDxe.inf |
> 46 ++++++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibDxe.uni |
> 17 +++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibPei.inf |
> 51 +++++++
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibPei.uni |
> 16 +++
> SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec |
> 23 ++-
> SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dsc |
> 10 +-
> SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.uni |
> 15 +-
> 12 files changed, 755 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibCommon.c
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibDxe.c
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibPei.c
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Include/Library/BaseHashLib.h
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibCommon.h
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibDxe.inf
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibDxe.uni
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibPei.inf
> create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Library/BaseHashLib/BaseHashLibPei.uni
>
> --
> 2.16.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 22:57 [PATCH v3 0/1] SecurityPkg/BaseHashLib: Implement Unified Hash Calculation API Sukerkar, Amol N
2020-01-15 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Sukerkar, Amol N
2020-01-15 23:52 ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
2020-01-16 0:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Sukerkar, Amol N
2020-01-16 0:55 ` Michael D Kinney
2020-01-16 2:14 ` Wang, Jian J
2020-01-16 4:25 ` Sukerkar, Amol N
2020-01-17 3:49 ` Sukerkar, Amol N
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9E5EAF0@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox