public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael D Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"sean.brogan@microsoft.com" <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:23:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9ECAA50@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29466.1583867434210258945@groups.io>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1797 bytes --]

Sean,

This is the reason that OvmfPkg was kept in the edk2 repo so only a single repo is required for local dev testing and CI testing.  Same reason for the EmulatorPkg.

The current rule for the edk2 repo is common firmware packages and virtual/emulated platforms.
The fact that there has not been bandwidth to implement the CI testing for OvmfPkg or EmulatorPkg is not a reasonable reason to remove them.

Mike

From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Sean via Groups.Io
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 12:11 PM
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>; devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:54 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This means we can reasonably require any contributor not to regress on
those platforms, given how they have full access to it, and this is
actually where i would like us to take the next step when it comes to
ci automation, i.e., automatically flag PRs that break the boot on a
selected set of qemu based configs.
I appreciate the viewpoint but I don't think edk2 has "required" this yet and I would push back on that if it was brought up for community discussion.  As you know I believe contributing to edk2 is much too hard already, and filled with custom edk2 workflows, and this one would only make it more of a burden to contribute.

I do however agree that if this is important to the edk2 community, systems/automation should be setup to run this type of thing.  If that happens, i don't think it is much harder to do it for multi-repo than single repo and if done right for multi-repo then other platforms can opt in as well and the efforts to build this infrastructure will scale well beyond a single virtual platform.

Thanks
Sean


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 42114 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-10 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-06 16:09 Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2 Rebecca Cran
2020-03-06 19:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-06 20:04   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-07  1:29 ` Yao, Jiewen
2020-03-24  1:34   ` Rebecca Cran
2020-03-25  0:04     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 18:18       ` [EXTERNAL] " Bret Barkelew
2020-03-27 12:56         ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 18:50       ` Rebecca Cran
     [not found] ` <15F9E16A0219E7B7.19404@groups.io>
2020-03-07  1:43   ` Yao, Jiewen
2020-03-07  7:39     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-07  7:52       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-08  2:40         ` Rebecca Cran
2020-03-09  6:08         ` Sean
2020-03-09 22:54           ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-09 23:17             ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10  1:50               ` Sean
2020-03-10  9:05                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 17:25                   ` Sean
2020-03-10 17:54                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-10 19:10                       ` Sean
2020-03-10 19:23                         ` Michael D Kinney [this message]
2020-03-10 19:44                           ` Sean
2020-03-10 20:04                             ` Rebecca Cran
2020-03-11  0:05                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11  0:30                               ` Sean
2020-03-11  3:21                             ` Liming Gao
2020-03-10 23:34                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11  0:43           ` Leif Lindholm
2020-03-07  7:53       ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9ECAA50@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox