From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] MdeModulePkg: implement generic PCI I/O driver for non-discoverable devices
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:47:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EA7116A2-A472-45DA-88B9-D035488EA323@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-ZZHFebTWGfAChyW8c=jLWHxRkxXSKXdtZN2vUg-ZvSg@mail.gmail.com>
Ok. I didn't realize your PCI access is different from the standard way. I agree the PciLib suggestion is not good.
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2016年11月16日,下午7:43,Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> 写道:
>
>> On 15 November 2016 at 11:30, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 15 November 2016 at 08:40, Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Ard,
>>> Can you check whether PciLib can be used to replace the implementation in
>>> NonDiscoverablePciDeviceIo.c?
>>>
>>
>> OK
>
> I am not sure how this should work. This driver needs to coexist with
> real PCI host bridge drivers, and the config space access method is
> fully defined by the requirements of the driver, i.e., each PCI config
> space access should be served from the fake PCI config space in
> memory, and never be forwarded to a real device.
>
> So /providing/ a PciLib implementation, and requiring that that
> particular implementation must be used with this driver makes no
> sense, I think.
> And depending on a PciLib implementation does not make sense either,
> since the platform cannot choose which method to use.
>
> Note that we are not emulating a PCI bus hierarchy, where a single
> contiguous chunk of memory emulates the entire config space of several
> devices. Each device is fully independent, and provides a minimal
> config space to describe the type of device, and the BARs
>
> Or did I miss something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-03 11:41 [PATCH v2 1/5] MdeModulePkg: introduce non-discoverable device protocol Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-03 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] MdeModule: introduce helper library to register non-discoverable devices Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-03 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] MdeModulePkg: implement generic PCI I/O driver for " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-15 8:40 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2016-11-15 11:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-16 11:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-16 11:47 ` Ni, Ruiyu [this message]
2016-11-03 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] MdeModulePkg/NonDiscoverablePciDeviceDxe: add support for non-coherent DMA Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-03 11:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Omap35xxPkg/PciEmulation: port to new non-discoverable device infrastructure Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-15 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] MdeModulePkg: introduce non-discoverable device protocol Ni, Ruiyu
2016-11-15 11:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-15 8:38 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2016-11-15 11:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EA7116A2-A472-45DA-88B9-D035488EA323@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox