public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Song, BinX" <binx.song@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Update AESNI support checking logic
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 07:27:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AA69888@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559D2DF22BC9A3468B4FA1AA547F0EF1025C9A07@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Song, BinX 
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2017 11:11 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; lersek@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Update AESNI support checking logic

With correct model CPU, current checking logic will always execute AsmReadMsr64 operation and then check ECX.AESNI[bit 25] = 1. Update checking logic to check ECX.AESNI[bit 25] = 1 first and then do AsmReadMsr64 operation.

Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.song@intel.com>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Aesni.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Aesni.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Aesni.c
index 880f092..56b1b55 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Aesni.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuCommonFeaturesLib/Aesni.c
@@ -62,15 +62,17 @@ AesniSupport (
 {
   MSR_SANDY_BRIDGE_FEATURE_CONFIG_REGISTER   *MsrFeatureConfig;
 
-  if (IS_SANDY_BRIDGE_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
-      IS_SILVERMONT_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
-      IS_XEON_5600_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
-      IS_XEON_E7_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
-      IS_XEON_PHI_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel)) {
-    MsrFeatureConfig = (MSR_SANDY_BRIDGE_FEATURE_CONFIG_REGISTER *) ConfigData;
-    ASSERT (MsrFeatureConfig != NULL);
-    MsrFeatureConfig[ProcessorNumber].Uint64 = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_SANDY_BRIDGE_FEATURE_CONFIG);
-    return (CpuInfo->CpuIdVersionInfoEcx.Bits.AESNI == 1);
+  if (CpuInfo->CpuIdVersionInfoEcx.Bits.AESNI == 1) {
+    if (IS_SANDY_BRIDGE_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
+        IS_SILVERMONT_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
+        IS_XEON_5600_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
+        IS_XEON_E7_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel) ||
+        IS_XEON_PHI_PROCESSOR (CpuInfo->DisplayFamily, CpuInfo->DisplayModel)) {
+      MsrFeatureConfig = (MSR_SANDY_BRIDGE_FEATURE_CONFIG_REGISTER *) ConfigData;
+      ASSERT (MsrFeatureConfig != NULL);
+      MsrFeatureConfig[ProcessorNumber].Uint64 = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_SANDY_BRIDGE_FEATURE_CONFIG);
+    }
+    return TRUE;
   }
   return FALSE;
 }
--
2.10.2.windows.1



      reply	other threads:[~2017-12-27  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-25  3:11 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Update AESNI support checking logic Song, BinX
2017-12-27  7:27 ` Dong, Eric [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AA69888@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox