public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: "Palmer, Thomas" <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>,
	"Bi, Dandan" <dandan.bi@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Wang, Nickle (HPS SW)" <nickle.wang@hpe.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Chao B" <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 02:55:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AB896E2@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TU4PR8401MB108681D69C5D098D1F68E534EDB40@TU4PR8401MB1086.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your patches. We just finished internal verification of them.

Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> and pushed them.

Thanks,
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Palmer, Thomas [mailto:thomas.palmer@hpe.com] 
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 12:00 AM
To: Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Wang, Nickle (HPS SW) <nickle.wang@hpe.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 1/8] IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function

I have no opinion / please the 5th.  I defer to the experts.


Regards,

Thomas Palmer

"I have only made this letter longer because I have not had the time to make it shorter" - Blaise Pascal


-----Original Message-----
From: Bi, Dandan [mailto:dandan.bi@intel.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 2:34 AM
To: Palmer, Thomas <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Wang, Nickle (HPS SW) <nickle.wang@hpe.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 1/8] IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function

Thanks for the updating. These changes make sense.
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>  for this patch series.

But the Spec seems not to be clear enough.
When looking into details about the "progress" parameter in EFI HII Configuration Routing Protocol and  EFI_HII_CONFIG_ACCESS_PROTOCOL.

Description of "progress" parameter in ExtractConfig() in UEFI 2.7 Spec:
Progress
On return, points to a character in the Request string. Points to the string's null terminator if request was successful. Points to the most recent '&' before the first failing name / value pair (or the beginning of the string if the failure is in the first name / value pair) if the request was not successful

EFI_NOT_FOUND
A configuration element matching the routing data is not found. Progress set to the first character in the routing header.


Description of "progress" parameter in RouteConfig () in UEFI 2.7 Spec:
Progress
a pointer to a string filled in with the offset of the most recent '&' before the first failing name / value pair (or the beginning of the string if the failure is in the first name / value pair) or the terminating NULL if all was successful.

EFI_NOT_FOUND
Target for the specified routing data was not found.

Compared with ExtractConfig(), the description of "Progress" parameter in RouteConfig()  is not very clear. 
We think an ECR is nice to have to clarify them. What do you think?


Thanks,
Dandan

-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Palmer
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 4:32 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: nickle.wang@hpe.com; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 1/8] IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function

According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration.  This patch ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
---
 .../Library/LegacyBootMaintUiLib/LegacyBootMaintUi.c                   | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Library/LegacyBootMaintUiLib/LegacyBootMaintUi.c b/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Library/LegacyBootMaintUiLib/LegacyBootMaintUi.c
index a4828b7130c7..3092184ab760 100644
--- a/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Library/LegacyBootMaintUiLib/LegacyBootMaintUi.c
+++ b/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Library/LegacyBootMaintUiLib/LegacyBootMai
+++ ntUi.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
   Legacy Boot Maintainence UI implementation.
 
 Copyright (c) 2004 - 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+(C) Copyright 2018 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
 This program and the accompanying materials  are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD License  which accompanies this distribution.  The full text of the license may be found at @@ -563,6 +564,8 @@ LegacyBootOptionRouteConfig (
     return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
   }
 
+  *Progress = Configuration;
+
   //
   // Check routing data in <ConfigHdr>.
   // Note: there is no name for Name/Value storage, only GUID will be checked
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel



      reply	other threads:[~2018-05-03  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-18 20:31 [PATCH 1/8] IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function Thomas Palmer
2018-04-20  7:34 ` Bi, Dandan
2018-04-20 16:00   ` Palmer, Thomas
2018-05-03  2:55     ` Dong, Eric [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AB896E2@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox