public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
To: Fan Jeff <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Optimize get processor number performance.
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 01:26:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AC345B4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR19MB22695C13EA19A741F4B1FB88D7410@SN6PR19MB2269.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>

Jeff,

Got it. Will update the change log when I commit the changes.

Thanks,
Eric
From: Fan Jeff [mailto:vanjeff_919@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 5:39 PM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: 答复: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Optimize get processor number performance.


Eric,



Current implementation does not call GetApicid() many times,  Please correct you commit message. Your fix is to improve the performance against the current implementation.



This code part is ok to me.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan vanjeff_919@hotmail.com<mailto:vanjeff_919@hotmail.com>



Thanks!

Jeff



发送自 Windows 10 版邮件<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>应用



________________________________
发件人: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com<mailto:eric.dong@intel.com>>
发送时间: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 4:37:36 PM
收件人: edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
抄送: Ruiyu Ni; Jeff Fan; Laszlo Ersek
主题: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Optimize get processor number performance.

Current function has low performance because it calls GetApicId
many times.

New logic first try to base on the stack range used by AP to
find the processor number. If this solution failed, then call
GetApicId once and base on this value to search the processor.

Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com<mailto:ruiyu.ni@intel.com>>
Cc: Jeff Fan <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com<mailto:vanjeff_919@hotmail.com>>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com<mailto:lersek@redhat.com>>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com<mailto:eric.dong@intel.com>>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index eb2765910c..abd65bee1a 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -418,7 +418,8 @@ ApInitializeSync (
 }

 /**
-  Find the current Processor number by APIC ID.
+  First try to find the current Processor number by stack address,
+  if it failed, then base on APIC ID.

   @param[in]  CpuMpData         Pointer to PEI CPU MP Data
   @param[out] ProcessorNumber   Return the pocessor number found
@@ -435,16 +436,34 @@ GetProcessorNumber (
   UINTN                   TotalProcessorNumber;
   UINTN                   Index;
   CPU_INFO_IN_HOB         *CpuInfoInHob;
+  UINT32                  CurrentApicId;

+  TotalProcessorNumber = CpuMpData->CpuCount;
   CpuInfoInHob = (CPU_INFO_IN_HOB *) (UINTN) CpuMpData->CpuInfoInHob;

-  TotalProcessorNumber = CpuMpData->CpuCount;
+  //
+  // First try to base on current stack address to find the AP index.
+  // &TotalProcessorNumber value located in the stack range.
+  //
   for (Index = 0; Index < TotalProcessorNumber; Index ++) {
-    if (CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApicId == GetApicId ()) {
+    if ((CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApTopOfStack > (UINTN) (&TotalProcessorNumber)) &&
+        (CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApTopOfStack - CpuMpData->CpuApStackSize < (UINTN) (&TotalProcessorNumber))) {
       *ProcessorNumber = Index;
       return EFI_SUCCESS;
     }
   }
+
+  //
+  // If can't base on stack to find the AP index, use the APIC ID.
+  //
+  CurrentApicId = GetApicId ();
+  for (Index = 0; Index < TotalProcessorNumber; Index ++) {
+    if (CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApicId == CurrentApicId) {
+      *ProcessorNumber = Index;
+      return EFI_SUCCESS;
+    }
+  }
+
   return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
 }

--
2.15.0.windows.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-04  8:37 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Optimize get processor number performance Eric Dong
     [not found] ` <SN6PR19MB22695C13EA19A741F4B1FB88D7410@SN6PR19MB2269.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
2018-07-05  1:26   ` Dong, Eric [this message]
2018-07-05  8:10     ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-05 13:04   ` 答复: " Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-05 13:15     ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-09  3:04     ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-09  6:13       ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-09  8:48         ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-11  7:45         ` Yao, Jiewen
2018-07-11 11:31           ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-11 15:11             ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-12  3:04               ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-18  2:50             ` Dong, Eric
2018-07-09  8:47       ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E66224AC345B4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox